> Maybe you can just drop this behavior for now, because this is indeed
> inconsistent with resolvedeps. Then if we want to reintroduce some
> kind of handling of multiple satisfiers in the future, it should be
> done for both explicit targets (which is currently done in frontend)
> and dependency resolving (in backend).
I've just found the following: '/' handling is done in backend
(sync_addtarget), so pacman -S db/sh won't do the expected operation,
because the provision handling is done in front-end. Is this OK?
pacman-dev mailing list