I would like to ask you about this patch:
* I'd like to refactor resolvedeps, and this function would be useful
there. (I think *list param can be input/output list of resolvedeps
like in recursedeps (and kill syncpkg param), and "find_literal"
"find_othersatisfier" parts can be moved to its own function and used
by front-end too...)
* Xavier says that this patch "Address two concerns". One of them
is the memleak caused by current _alpm_find_dep_satisfiers usage (which
returns with a list, but we don't free it), which needs to be fixed
even if this patch will be rejected.
I think that _alpm_find_first_satisfier implementation is a bit
complicated... I would prefer just ~reimplement
_alpm_find_dep_satisfiers instead of calling it (and introducing a new
pacman-dev mailing list