[2012-08-14 16:19:18 +0200] Ralf Mardorf:
> Regarding to this discussion I don't like his opinion.

You call this a discussion when all you've been doing is post useless
oneliners and decide whether or not you like other's opinions?

Please do everyone a big favor next time you are about to send your
prose to this list and ask yourself if it is not completely brainless.

--
Gaetan

On Tuesday 14 Aug 2012 18:00:25 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Btw. my Arch Linux is absolutely stable, excepted of one change. I
> tested Network Manager, this software is not that good. However, IIUC
> switching back to netcfg which always was stable on my machine might
> cause issues, when not using systemd?!

I've been using Wicd on my laptop for ages. I'd highly recommend it: it's
straight-forward and has never failed me. I'd only use it on a laptop,
though. For fixed computers it's probably best to stick to netcfg.

Paul

> If there's a developer anywhere that agrees with you, and I expect there will be at some point, udev will be forked, or something else will be developed to rival systemd. Right now, that's not even necessary.

Little need but may well be.

http://blog.stuart.shelton.me/archives/891

--
__________________________________________________ _____________________

'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work
together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a
universal interface'

(Doug McIlroy)
__________________________________________________ _____________________

On Wednesday 15 Aug 2012 02:13:26 Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Quote from IRC today:
>
> #systemd: mezcalero » falconindy: ah, arch switches for good?
> #systemd: mezcalero » falconindy: that's great news
> #systemd: mezcalero » falconindy: if you need any upstream support for
> this, just ping
>
> (where mezcalero is Lennart and falconindy is Dave).
>
> Really, I don't think this is something we need to worry about.
>

+1

--
Cheers and Regards
Jayesh Badwaik
stop html mail | always bottom-post
www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html

heh this whole thread is hilarious, I believe upstream is eager to do so
just so people will stop complaining xD

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto <
denisfalqueto@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Anthony 'Ishpeck' Tedjamulia
> <archlinux@ishpeck.net> wrote:
> > I know that nobody in arch has declared the switch is inevitable
> > but the way it looks, with upstream being eager enough to do so,
> > it seems incredibly likely unless we train everyone to use DJB's
> > daemontools instead. :P http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html
>
> You should check arch-dev-public
>
> It's a funny thread
>
>
> https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-August/023389.html
>
> --
> A: Because it obfuscates the reading.
> Q: Why is top posting so bad?
> For more information, please read: http://idallen.com/topposting.html
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Denis A. Altoe Falqueto
> Linux user #524555
> -------------------------------------------
>