On Jul 3, 2012 7:37 PM, "arnaud gaboury" <arnaud.gaboury@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry for the wrong subject. I had an error at boot, same as the one
> described. I remember adding settings about checking LVM2 at boot when I
> set up my LVM group. Currently traveling, so can'r give you more details,
> but I guess new iniscript broke something with LVM.
> Regards
Yeah, this is known. Being fixed.
Tom
> ####Sent from my Galaxy S2 running Cyanogenmod 9#### Come and chat on
> Googletalk
> On Jul 3, 2012 7:06 PM, "Tom Gundersen" <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 3, 2012 4:36 PM, "Arno Gaboury" <arnaud.gaboury@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear list,
> > >
> > > I refer to this bug report:
> > >
> > >> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30517
> > >
> > >
> > > I have exactly the same situation at boot, and this didn't happend
> > before.
> >
> > The bug report is about lvm, and your email appears to be about btrfs...
> > Seems some info is missing.
> >
> > As to the bug report, it was just assigned to me, so I will sort it or
> > tonight (I hope).
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > > Form my kernel.log:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373550] INFO: task
> > btrfs-transacti:353 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373554] "echo 0 >
> > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373557] btrfs-transacti D
> > ffff880402ae3b58 0 353 2 0x00000000
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373562] ffff880402bc3c80
> > 0000000000000046 ffff880402ae3790 ffff880402bc3fd8
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373568] ffff880402bc3fd8
> > ffff880402bc3fd8 ffff880408daa7b0 ffff880402ae3790
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373580] ffff88041f493740
> > 0000000000013740 ffff880400000000 ffff880402bc3bc8
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373583] Call Trace:
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373590]
[<ffffffff81013580>] ?
> > __switch_to+0x120/0x410
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373595] [<ffffffff81468b29>]
> > schedule+0x29/0x70
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373598] [<ffffffff81468df7>]
> > schedule_preempt_disabled+0x27/0x40
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373600] [<ffffffff814674a8>]
> > __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x148/0x340
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373603] [<ffffffff814676b6>]
> > mutex_lock+0x16/0x30
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373625] [<ffffffffa013d2bb>]
> > btrfs_run_ordered_operations+0x3b/0x210 [btrfs]
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373636] [<ffffffffa011d3a4>]
> > btrfs_commit_transaction+0x74/0xaa0 [btrfs]
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373646]
[<ffffffffa011ca4c>] ?
> > join_transaction.isra.22+0x2dc/0x310 [btrfs]
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373650]
[<ffffffff81073b60>] ?
> > abort_exclusive_wait+0xb0/0xb0
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373660] [<ffffffffa0115e25>]
> > transaction_kthread+0x235/0x2b0 [btrfs]
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373669]
[<ffffffffa0115bf0>] ?
> > btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 [btrfs]
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373671] [<ffffffff810731d3>]
> > kthread+0x93/0xa0
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373674] [<ffffffff8146bbe4>]
> > kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373677]
[<ffffffff81073140>] ?
> > kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
> > >> Jul 3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373680]
[<ffffffff8146bbe0>] ?
> > gs_change+0x13/0x13
> > >
> > >
> > > Is it really a bug, or did I miss something or did something wrong?
> > >
> > > TY for any advise.
> >
initscripts 20120631 and BTRFS
