Pacman v4.0.1-4 could be less verbose
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:29 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 17:09 -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> > Well, usually people complain that pacman doesn't show enough info... Have you
> > tried the -q options?
> No I didn't.
> # pacman -Syup
> at the moment only will remove the unwanted output.
> Thank you,
I was mistaken.
Unfortunately the p option already suppress "there is nothing to do"