FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > ArchLinux > ArchLinux General Discussion

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 01-25-2012, 07:27 AM
Alexandre Ferrando
 
Default lib32-xcb, libxcb, and xcb-proto newer than in repos?

On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@gmail.com> wrote:
> :: Starting full system upgrade...
> warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3)
> warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2)
> warning: xcb-proto: local (1.7-1) is newer than extra (1.6-2)
>
> I thought it'd just be an outdated mirror or something, but a check on
> archlinux.org searching for xcb shows that the latter versions are
> current in the repos. Did something travel backward in time?

Outdated mirror. This was something that got solved in Saturday.
 
Old 01-25-2012, 07:41 AM
Oon-Ee Ng
 
Default lib32-xcb, libxcb, and xcb-proto newer than in repos?

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando <alferpal@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> :: Starting full system upgrade...
>> warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3)
>> warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2)
>> warning: xcb-proto: local (1.7-1) is newer than extra (1.6-2)
>>
>> I thought it'd just be an outdated mirror or something, but a check on
>> archlinux.org searching for xcb shows that the latter versions are
>> current in the repos. Did something travel backward in time?
>
> Outdated mirror. This was something that got solved in Saturday.

Why would the website show otherwise?

http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=libxcb

It shows 1.7-3 for lib32-libxcb and 1.7-2 for libxcb here for me.
Doubt my browser checks for /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist (hopefully).
 
Old 01-25-2012, 07:46 AM
Alexandre Ferrando
 
Default lib32-xcb, libxcb, and xcb-proto newer than in repos?

On 25 January 2012 09:41, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando <alferpal@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> :: Starting full system upgrade...
>>> warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3)
>>> warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2)
>>> warning: xcb-proto: local (1.7-1) is newer than extra (1.6-2)
>>>
>>> I thought it'd just be an outdated mirror or something, but a check on
>>> archlinux.org searching for xcb shows that the latter versions are
>>> current in the repos. Did something travel backward in time?
>>
>> Outdated mirror. This was something that got solved in Saturday.
>
> Why would the website show otherwise?
>
> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=libxcb
>
> It shows 1.7-3 for lib32-libxcb and 1.7-2 for libxcb here for me.
> Doubt my browser checks for /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist (hopefully).

Because libxcb 1.8 was dropped. See [1]

[1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-January/022433.html
 
Old 01-25-2012, 08:28 AM
Oon-Ee Ng
 
Default lib32-xcb, libxcb, and xcb-proto newer than in repos?

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Alexandre Ferrando <alferpal@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 January 2012 09:41, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando <alferpal@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> :: Starting full system upgrade...
>>>> warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3)
>>>> warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2)
>>>> warning: xcb-proto: local (1.7-1) is newer than extra (1.6-2)
>>>>
>>>> I thought it'd just be an outdated mirror or something, but a check on
>>>> archlinux.org searching for xcb shows that the latter versions are
>>>> current in the repos. Did something travel backward in time?
>>>
>>> Outdated mirror. This was something that got solved in Saturday.
>>
>> Why would the website show otherwise?
>>
>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=libxcb
>>
>> It shows 1.7-3 for lib32-libxcb and 1.7-2 for libxcb here for me.
>> Doubt my browser checks for /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist (hopefully).
>
> Because libxcb 1.8 was dropped. See [1]
>
> [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-January/022433.html

Thanks, missed that. Sorry for the noise.
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:42 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org