I have just updated the ABS tree and the [community] and [multilib]
directories are missing, is this intentional or a problem?

grep -v ^# /etc/abs.conf | grep -v ^$
[ "$ABSROOT" = "" ] && ABSROOT="/var/abs/"
SYNCSERVER="rsync.archlinux.org"
ARCH="x86_64"
MIRRORLIST="/etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist"
REPOS=(core extra community multilib !testing !community-testing
!multilib-testing
!staging !community-staging !gnome-unstable !kde-unstable)

abs -t
==> Downloading tarballs...
==> core...
==> extra...
==> community...
==> multilib...
==> ERROR: Download failed

grep -v ^# /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist | grep -v ^$
Server = ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
Server = ftp://archlinux.puzzle.ch/$repo/os/$arch
Server = ftp://ftp.rnl.ist.utl.pt/pub/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
Server = ftp://mirrors.uk2.net/pub/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch

--
Mauro Santos

Mauro Santos (2012-01-12 09:58):
> I have just updated the ABS tree and the [community] and [multilib]
> directories are missing, is this intentional or a problem?
>
> grep -v ^# /etc/abs.conf | grep -v ^$
> [ "$ABSROOT" = "" ] && ABSROOT="/var/abs/"
> SYNCSERVER="rsync.archlinux.org"
> ARCH="x86_64"
> MIRRORLIST="/etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist"
> REPOS=(core extra community multilib !testing !community-testing
> !multilib-testing
> !staging !community-staging !gnome-unstable !kde-unstable)
>
> abs -t
> ==> Downloading tarballs...
> ==> core...
> ==> extra...
> ==> community...
> ==> multilib...
> ==> ERROR: Download failed
>
> grep -v ^# /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist | grep -v ^$
> Server = ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
> Server = ftp://archlinux.puzzle.ch/$repo/os/$arch
> Server = ftp://ftp.rnl.ist.utl.pt/pub/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
> Server = ftp://mirrors.uk2.net/pub/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch

Might be related to this:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-January/022378.html

On 12-01-2012 10:07, RogutÄ—s Sparnuotos wrote:
>
> Might be related to this:
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-January/022378.html
>

But I'm using x86_64 and if anything it should be i686 that got affected
I suppose.

--
Mauro Santos

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Mauro Santos
<registo.mailling@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12-01-2012 10:07, RogutÄ—s Sparnuotos wrote:
>>
>> Might be related to this:
>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-January/022378.html
>>
> But I'm using x86_64 and if anything it should be i686 that got affected
> I suppose.

i686 is affected too:
[karol@black ~]$ ls /var/abs
README core extra local