I haven't seen tpowa's normal kernel signoff, so just dropping a note it's
good on multiple x86_64 and i686 boxes here.
Only issue this time, which I haven't seen in the past 4-5 kernels, was the
x86_64 MSI box that had a problem with the boot image being placed in a location
that leaves the box unable to boot with grub. This is just a Russian Roulette
issue with this one box. All others server & desktop installs updated fine.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
12-16-2011, 06:17 PM
Karol Blazewicz
signoff linux-3.1.5-1
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:14 PM, David C. Rankin
<drankinatty@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> *I haven't seen tpowa's normal kernel signoff
Maybe it's because
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-November/021972.html
?
12-16-2011, 06:32 PM
Lukas Fleischer
signoff linux-3.1.5-1
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:17:24PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:14 PM, David C. Rankin
> <drankinatty@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > *I haven't seen tpowa's normal kernel signoff
>
> Maybe it's because
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-November/021972.html
> ?
Correct. You can still reply to signoff reports if you want to leave a
comment.
Fri Dec 16 22:30:01 2011
Return-path: <advisory-board-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:32:51 +0200
Received: from bastion01.fedoraproject.org ([209.132.181.2]:57200 heloºstion.fedoraproject.org)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <advisory-board-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org>)
id 1RbdWV-0003nB-LH
for tom@linux-archive.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:32:51 +0200
Received: from lists.fedoraproject.org (collab03.vpn.fedoraproject.org [192.168.1.70])
by bastion01.phx2.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AC82198B;
Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:32:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from collab03.fedoraproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4574170D;
Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:32:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org
Delivered-To: advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org
Received: from smtp-mm01.fedoraproject.org (smtp-mm01.fedoraproject.org
[80.239.156.217])
by lists.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C26415D6
for <advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org>;
Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:32:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41])
by smtp-mm01.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460E487E7D
for <advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org>;
Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:32:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgbdt12 with SMTP id dt12so3281867wgb.2
for <advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org>;
Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:32:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=geYiRR66pL65VKRC1mLVpuBPgzx8WAIFc3VwVSsLd7w=;
b=uKPPGO4MjN9TwnxDcm5rYmJcL0iTGV2GfLOvpcHL45R/KF9N3Y8ESE/tpooDo+H4mG
cvmwWwsVhqTPDUmID/DrHvvpjSg3Qtwc34nW8z7DTe1wZ6wMljuaTX1BeyDXvNz4qUQH
RSM2unFopX4+hXiV166QA59Wdf3rq0Pat7YCwReceived: by 10.180.3.37 with SMTP id 5mr14246437wiz.43.1324063973477;
Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:32:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (157-157-73-36.dsl.dynamic.simnet.is.
[157.157.73.36])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fg15sm15708652wbb.7.2011.12.16.11.32.47
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:32:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EEB9CC0.2080603@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:32:16 +0000
From: =?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==? <johannbg@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: FYI board tickets.
References: <4EEB8460.1090000@gmail.com>
<CAKprHVY86WkhCudFnm1xxdJoqviZ9HZ=etpkoe_5Yo+CHMop Wg@mail.gmail.com>
<1324063470.24120.155.camel@denkermatic.localdomai n>
In-Reply-To: <1324063470.24120.155.camel@denkermatic.localdomai n>
X-BeenThere: advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Fedora community advisory board
<advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org>
List-Id: Fedora community advisory board
<advisory-board.lists.fedoraproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/options/advisory-board>,
<mailto:advisory-board-request@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscrib e>
List-Archive: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/>
List-Post: <mailto:advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:advisory-board-request@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board>,
<mailto:advisory-board-request@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Sender: advisory-board-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org
Errors-To: advisory-board-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 12/16/2011 01:17 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> Maybe it's because
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-November/021972.html
> ?
That was it.. Missed the dev post
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
12-17-2011, 02:58 AM
Karol Blazewicz
signoff linux-3.1.5-1
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:47 AM, David C. Rankin
<drankinatty@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 01:17 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>> Maybe it's because
>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-November/021972.html
>> ?
>
> That was it.. Missed the dev post
Don't feel bad, you're not the only one
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=130731 :-P