codecs/codecs64 - what's the scoop? Why the massive difference.
Am 10.11.2011 07:21, schrieb David C. Rankin:
> Guys,
>
> I'm trying to figure out why the i686 codecs package (rm from extra
> now in aur) is so massively different from the x86_64 codecs64 package
> in aur. The i686 package seems fine, but the x86_64 package seems to be
> nothing but a shadow of a package:
What you should figure out is that you don't need either of those packages.
11-10-2011, 04:41 PM
"David C. Rankin"
codecs/codecs64 - what's the scoop? Why the massive difference.
On 11/10/2011 08:09 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
What you should figure out is that you don't need either of those packages.