Hi,
i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is
http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEBd
Thanks

Shaman is deprecated. Just don't use it anymore.




On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:07:32 +0300, Madhurya Kakati
<mkakati2805@gmail.com> wrote:



Hi,
i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is
http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEB

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:41 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
> Shaman is deprecated. Just don't use it anymore.
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:07:32 +0300, Madhurya Kakati <mkakati2805@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is
>> http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEB
>

is there any other option? and please don't tell me to use pacman. I
do use it. Just want to try out a graphical frontend.

Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:41 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Shaman is deprecated. Just don't use it anymore.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:07:32 +0300, Madhurya Kakati <mkakati2805@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is
>>> http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEB
>
> is there any other option? and please don't tell me to use pacman. I
> do use it. Just want to try out a graphical frontend.
>
shaman2-svn...

Jerome
--
mailto:jeberger@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeberger@jabber.fr

On 05/06/10 15:28, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:

Madhurya Kakati wrote:

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:41 AM, xenof0nt<xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:

Shaman is deprecated. Just don't use it anymore.




On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:07:32 +0300, Madhurya Kakati<mkakati2805@gmail.com>
wrote:


Hi,
i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is
http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEB


is there any other option? and please don't tell me to use pacman. I
do use it. Just want to try out a graphical frontend.


shaman2-svn...



Warning! alpha software. Not a god choice for managing your system...

On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:24:41 +0300, Madhurya Kakati
<mkakati2805@gmail.com> wrote:



On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:41 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:

Shaman is deprecated. Just don't use it anymore.




On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:07:32 +0300, Madhurya Kakati
<mkakati2805@gmail.com>

wrote:


Hi,
i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is
http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEB




is there any other option? and please don't tell me to use pacman. I
do use it. Just want to try out a graphical frontend.



Sorry there is no other alternative. The only solution is Shaman2 but
currently is in Alpha stage. That means it is highly unstable and
dangerous for your system.

Arch will never provide a graphical tool for pacman.
So if you can't live with this, then change to another distro

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:36 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry there is no other alternative. The only solution is Shaman2 but
> currently is in Alpha stage. That means it is highly unstable and dangerous
> for your system.
> Arch will never provide a graphical tool for pacman.
> So if you can't live with this, then change to another distro
>

Never say never.
Just curious, where does that come from ?
Why couldn't a sufficiently motivated developer write a GUI frontend
to libalpm good enough to get it packaged ?
This actually happened with shaman, it was packaged in community by
the main makepkg developer, Allan !

On 06/04/2010 11:36 PM, xenof0nt wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:24:41 +0300, Madhurya Kakati
> <mkakati2805@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:41 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Shaman is deprecated. Just don't use it anymore.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:07:32 +0300, Madhurya Kakati
>>> <mkakati2805@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> i am unable to install shaman from AUR via yaourt error is
>>>> http://pastebin.com/hfG3zEB
>>>
>>
>> is there any other option? and please don't tell me to use pacman. I
>> do use it. Just want to try out a graphical frontend.
>
>
> Sorry there is no other alternative. The only solution is Shaman2 but
> currently is in Alpha stage. That means it is highly unstable and
> dangerous for your system.
> Arch will never provide a graphical tool for pacman.
> So if you can't live with this, then change to another distro

What about packagekit? It seemed fairly stable when I tried it (I
stopped because it doesn't display messages about packages but I don't
if shaman does either).

On Sat 05 Jun 2010 23:05 +0200, Xavier Chantry wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:36 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Arch will never provide a graphical tool for pacman.
> > So if you can't live with this, then change to another distro
>
> Never say never.
> Just curious, where does that come from ?
> Why couldn't a sufficiently motivated developer write a GUI frontend
> to libalpm good enough to get it packaged ?

At least it'll never be in core. Good enough for me!

On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:36 AM, xenof0nt <xenof0nt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry there is no other alternative. The only solution is Shaman2 but
>> currently is in Alpha stage. That means it is highly unstable and dangerous
>> for your system.
>> Arch will never provide a graphical tool for pacman.
>> So if you can't live with this, then change to another distro
>>
>
> Never say never.
> Just curious, where does that come from ?
> Why couldn't a sufficiently motivated developer write a GUI frontend
> to libalpm good enough to get it packaged ?
> This actually happened with shaman, it was packaged in community by
> the main makepkg developer, Allan !
>

Yea. Whats wrong with a GUI frontend? People will use pacman or the
frontend- whichever they prefer. I know arch's wants to keep it simple
but providing a good frontend in the repos isnt a bad idea.