I want to get a report from someone that an installation went fine.
what kind of install doesn't really matter. manual, automatic,
autoprepare, net/core whatever. this has been tested enough before, so
any kind of install with each single image.
On top of that, I want:
A) confirmation for virtio_pci and virtio_blk on the install ISO's
initramfs http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19401?project=6
B) at least one installation performed from a usb stick, using any of
the above images.
So if you test: send a reply mentioning which file you tested, and
optionally if you can confirm A/B
thanks for you help,
Dieter
05-14-2010, 04:10 PM
甘露(Gan Lu)
final release candidate images for testing
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be> wrote:
> new images are done.
> version: 2010.05.13
>
> these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release
> after testing.
>
> http://build.archlinux.org/isos/Changelog
> http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
>
> how should they be tested?
>
> for every file, that is:
>
> archlinux-2010.05.13-core-dual.iso
> archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso
> archlinux-2010.05.13-core-x86_64.iso
> archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-dual.iso
> archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso
> archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-x86_64.iso
>
> I want to get a report from someone that an installation went fine.
> what kind of install doesn't really matter. manual, automatic,
> autoprepare, net/core whatever. this has been tested enough before, so
> any kind of install with each single image.
>
>
> On top of that, I want:
> A) confirmation for virtio_pci and virtio_blk on the install ISO's
> initramfs Â*http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19401?project=6
> B) at least one installation performed from a usb stick, using any of
> the above images.
>
>
> So if you test: send a reply mentioning which file you tested, and
> optionally if you can confirm A/B
My current system is installed from previous
archlinux-2010.04.05-core-i686 image, but no idea about the release
candidate image.
I am using an IBM T43P.
>
> thanks for you help,
> Dieter
>
05-15-2010, 07:04 AM
Dmitry Korzhevin
final release candidate images for testing
14.05.2010 18:16, Dieter Plaetinck пишет:
new images are done.
version: 2010.05.13
these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release
after testing.
I want to get a report from someone that an installation went fine.
what kind of install doesn't really matter. manual, automatic,
autoprepare, net/core whatever. this has been tested enough before, so
any kind of install with each single image.
On top of that, I want:
A) confirmation for virtio_pci and virtio_blk on the install ISO's
initramfs http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19401?project=6
B) at least one installation performed from a usb stick, using any of
the above images.
So if you test: send a reply mentioning which file you tested, and
optionally if you can confirm A/B
thanks for you help,
Dieter
Hello,
I'm testing archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso, AIF does not see HDD on
computer.
00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 PCI Bridge
00:19.0 PCI bridge: ALi Corporation M5249 HTT to PCI Bridge
00:1b.0 Ethernet controller: ALi Corporation ULi 1689,1573 integrated
ethernet. (rev 50)
00:1c.0 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03)
00:1c.1 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03)
00:1c.2 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03)
00:1c.3 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 2.0 Controller (rev 01)
00:1d.0 Audio device: ALi Corporation High Definition Audio/AC'97 Host
Controller
00:1e.0 ISA bridge: ALi Corporation PCI to LPC Controller (rev 31)
00:1e.1 Bridge: ALi Corporation M7101 Power Management Controller [PMU]
00:1f.0 IDE interface: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE (rev c7)
00:1f.1 SATA controller: ALi Corporation ULi 5287 SATA (rev 02)
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RC410 [Radeon
Xpress 200]
What can you recommend?
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Korzhevin
Tel: +38 (039) 295-0000
Office Phone: +38 (044) 383-14-12
E-mail: dkorzhevin@lsupport.net
Jabber ID: dkorzhevin@lsupport.net
Skype: dkorzhevin
URL: http://lsupport.net
Linux Support LLC
05-15-2010, 08:22 AM
Dieter Plaetinck
final release candidate images for testing
On Sat, 15 May 2010 10:04:40 +0300
Dmitry Korzhevin <dkorzhevin@lsupport.net> wrote:
> 14.05.2010 18:16, Dieter Plaetinck пишет:
> > new images are done.
> > version: 2010.05.13
> >
> > these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release
> > after testing.
> >
> > http://build.archlinux.org/isos/Changelog
> > http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
> >
> > how should they be tested?
> >
> > for every file, that is:
> >
> > archlinux-2010.05.13-core-dual.iso
> > archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso
> > archlinux-2010.05.13-core-x86_64.iso
> > archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-dual.iso
> > archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso
> > archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-x86_64.iso
> >
> > I want to get a report from someone that an installation went fine.
> > what kind of install doesn't really matter. manual, automatic,
> > autoprepare, net/core whatever. this has been tested enough before,
> > so any kind of install with each single image.
> >
> >
> > On top of that, I want:
> > A) confirmation for virtio_pci and virtio_blk on the install ISO's
> > initramfs http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19401?project=6
> > B) at least one installation performed from a usb stick, using any
> > of the above images.
> >
> >
> > So if you test: send a reply mentioning which file you tested, and
> > optionally if you can confirm A/B
> >
> > thanks for you help,
> > Dieter
> >
> >
> Hello,
>
> I'm testing archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso, AIF does not see HDD
> on computer.
>
> Computer Configuration:
>
>
> 00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Xpress 200 Host
> Bridge (rev 01)
> 00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 PCI Bridge
> 00:19.0 PCI bridge: ALi Corporation M5249 HTT to PCI Bridge
> 00:1b.0 Ethernet controller: ALi Corporation ULi 1689,1573 integrated
> ethernet. (rev 50)
> 00:1c.0 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03)
> 00:1c.1 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03)
> 00:1c.2 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03)
> 00:1c.3 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 2.0 Controller (rev 01)
> 00:1d.0 Audio device: ALi Corporation High Definition Audio/AC'97
> Host Controller
> 00:1e.0 ISA bridge: ALi Corporation PCI to LPC Controller (rev 31)
> 00:1e.1 Bridge: ALi Corporation M7101 Power Management Controller
> [PMU] 00:1f.0 IDE interface: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE (rev c7)
> 00:1f.1 SATA controller: ALi Corporation ULi 5287 SATA (rev 02)
> 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RC410 [Radeon
> Xpress 200]
>
> What can you recommend?
>
thanks for testing,
please make a bugreport on the bugtracker, in which you specify:
- full dmesg output (on a pastebin)
- fdisk -l (as root)
thanks,
dieter
05-15-2010, 06:25 PM
Dries De Smet
final release candidate images for testing
archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005 HA, from
usb stick, everything went fine. Just didn't detect wireless with kernel
2.6.32, but that's solved after updating.
2010/5/15 Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be>
> On Sat, 15 May 2010 10:04:40 +0300
> Dmitry Korzhevin <dkorzhevin@lsupport.net> wrote:
>
> > 14.05.2010 18:16, Dieter Plaetinck пишет:
> > > new images are done.
> > > version: 2010.05.13
> > >
> > > these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release
> > > after testing.
> > >
> > > http://build.archlinux.org/isos/Changelog
> > > http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
> > >
> > > how should they be tested?
> > >
> > > for every file, that is:
> > >
> > > archlinux-2010.05.13-core-dual.iso
> > > archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso
> > > archlinux-2010.05.13-core-x86_64.iso
> > > archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-dual.iso
> > > archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso
> > > archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-x86_64.iso
> > >
> > > I want to get a report from someone that an installation went fine.
> > > what kind of install doesn't really matter. manual, automatic,
> > > autoprepare, net/core whatever. this has been tested enough before,
> > > so any kind of install with each single image.
> > >
> > >
> > > On top of that, I want:
> > > A) confirmation for virtio_pci and virtio_blk on the install ISO's
> > > initramfs http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19401?project=6
> > > B) at least one installation performed from a usb stick, using any
> > > of the above images.
> > >
> > >
> > > So if you test: send a reply mentioning which file you tested, and
> > > optionally if you can confirm A/B
> > >
> > > thanks for you help,
> > > Dieter
> > >
> > >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm testing archlinux-2010.05.13-core-i686.iso, AIF does not see HDD
> > on computer.
> >
> > Computer Configuration:
> >
> >
> > 00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Xpress 200 Host
> > Bridge (rev 01)
> > 00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 PCI Bridge
> > 00:19.0 PCI bridge: ALi Corporation M5249 HTT to PCI Bridge
> > 00:1b.0 Ethernet controller: ALi Corporation ULi 1689,1573 integrated
> > ethernet. (rev 50)
> > 00:1c.0 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03)
> > 00:1c.1 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03)
> > 00:1c.2 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03)
> > 00:1c.3 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 2.0 Controller (rev 01)
> > 00:1d.0 Audio device: ALi Corporation High Definition Audio/AC'97
> > Host Controller
> > 00:1e.0 ISA bridge: ALi Corporation PCI to LPC Controller (rev 31)
> > 00:1e.1 Bridge: ALi Corporation M7101 Power Management Controller
> > [PMU] 00:1f.0 IDE interface: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE (rev c7)
> > 00:1f.1 SATA controller: ALi Corporation ULi 5287 SATA (rev 02)
> > 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RC410 [Radeon
> > Xpress 200]
> >
> > What can you recommend?
> >
>
> thanks for testing,
> please make a bugreport on the bugtracker, in which you specify:
> - full dmesg output (on a pastebin)
> - fdisk -l (as root)
>
> thanks,
> dieter
>
05-16-2010, 08:22 AM
Michael Towers
final release candidate images for testing
2010/5/15 Dries De Smet <driesdesmet@gmail.com>:
> archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005 HA, from
> usb stick, everything went fine. Just didn't detect wireless with kernel
> 2.6.32, but that's solved after updating.
>
Are you using 2.6.32 on the isos? I suppose you don't want to change
this, but I think there are more devices than just the asus 1005HA
using this wireless chip, and it really doesn't work with 2.6.32. This
could be a pain for some people.
05-16-2010, 08:41 AM
Dieter Plaetinck
final release candidate images for testing
On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:22:30 +0200
Michael Towers <larch42@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2010/5/15 Dries De Smet <driesdesmet@gmail.com>:
> > archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005
> > HA, from usb stick, everything went fine. Just didn't detect
> > wireless with kernel 2.6.32, but that's solved after updating.
> >
>
> Are you using 2.6.32 on the isos? I suppose you don't want to change
> this, but I think there are more devices than just the asus 1005HA
> using this wireless chip, and it really doesn't work with 2.6.32. This
> could be a pain for some people.
all images should be built with 2.6.33.3-2,
it's also this kernel that should be available as a package on core
images.
i have to go now, i can check later what the package is in core images,
but maybe someone else can do it in the meantime.
Dieter
05-16-2010, 10:23 AM
Dieter Plaetinck
final release candidate images for testing
On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:41:39 +0200
Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:22:30 +0200
> Michael Towers <larch42@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > 2010/5/15 Dries De Smet <driesdesmet@gmail.com>:
> > > archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005
> > > HA, from usb stick, everything went fine. Just didn't detect
> > > wireless with kernel 2.6.32, but that's solved after updating.
> > >
> >
> > Are you using 2.6.32 on the isos? I suppose you don't want to change
> > this, but I think there are more devices than just the asus 1005HA
> > using this wireless chip, and it really doesn't work with 2.6.32.
> > This could be a pain for some people.
>
> all images should be built with 2.6.33.3-2,
> it's also this kernel that should be available as a package on core
> images.
> i have to go now, i can check later what the package is in core
> images, but maybe someone else can do it in the meantime.
>
> Dieter
okay, where do you guys see this 2.6.32 ?
netinstall and core install use 2.6.33, and the version
in /src/core/pkg on the core image is also 2.6.33 (tested the i686
images).
so please explain.. or are you doing a netinstall with a really
outdated mirror?
Dieter
05-16-2010, 10:47 AM
Thomas Bächler
final release candidate images for testing
Am 16.05.2010 12:23, schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
>>> 2010/5/15 Dries De Smet <driesdesmet@gmail.com>:
>>>> archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005
>>>> HA, from usb stick, everything went fine. Just didn't detect
>>>> wireless with kernel 2.6.32, but that's solved after updating.
>
> okay, where do you guys see this 2.6.32 ?
> netinstall and core install use 2.6.33, and the version
> in /src/core/pkg on the core image is also 2.6.33 (tested the i686
> images).
This looks like the wireless issue Chris and Keith had.
final release candidate images for testing
