Moving to pkg.tar.xz officially?
On 09/03/2010, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 9. März 2010 09:19:22 schrieb Ng Oon-Ee: >> What about devs/tus who also maintain AUR packages? As I recall AUR >> doesn't accept .tar.xz yet? > > You cannot upload packages to AUR anyway. Source packages can be kept as > src.tar.gz. There shouldn't be a reall difference if you compress a pkgbuild > with gz or xz. Yep, the lzma change is only relevant for binaries, and all you need to change is the third-last character of the second-last variable in /etc/makepkg.conf :) Btw, aside from namcap (which Ghost1227 semi-patched for PKGBUILD.com), bash-completion for pacman needs to be updated. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD |
Moving to pkg.tar.xz officially?
On 09/03/2010, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 09/03/10 20:09, Ray Rashif wrote: >> Btw, aside from namcap (which Ghost1227 semi-patched for >> PKGBUILD.com), > > Why... namcap in testing works fine. > > >> bash-completion for pacman needs to be updated. > > Fixed in git: > http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/commit/?id=d85421ec Great, then that takes care of everything now. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD |
Moving to pkg.tar.xz officially?
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 13:19:58 Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> Well, what about moving testing/namcap to extra? ok, for me. -- Andrea |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.