Simple upgrade, with a few minor backend features, and removed the
DEBUG flag from the build.

If you upgrade and pacman can still download things, we're in business.

_______________________________________________
arch-dev-public mailing list
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public

On Nov 28, 2007 1:39 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Simple upgrade, with a few minor backend features, and removed the
> DEBUG flag from the build.
>
> If you upgrade and pacman can still download things, we're in business.

Good here for i686.

-Dan

_______________________________________________
arch-dev-public mailing list
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public

On Nov 28, 2007 7:11 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2007 1:39 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Simple upgrade, with a few minor backend features, and removed the
> > DEBUG flag from the build.
> >
> > If you upgrade and pacman can still download things, we're in business.
>
> Good here for i686.

Poke poke - this has been in testing for too long. If you've been
using pacman all this time, then it works fine - please signoff.

_______________________________________________
arch-dev-public mailing list
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:

> On Nov 28, 2007 7:11 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 28, 2007 1:39 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Simple upgrade, with a few minor backend features, and removed the
>>> DEBUG flag from the build.
>>>
>>> If you upgrade and pacman can still download things, we're in business.
>>
>> Good here for i686.
>
> Poke poke - this has been in testing for too long. If you've been
> using pacman all this time, then it works fine - please signoff.
>

signing off for both arches.

Eric

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


_______________________________________________
arch-dev-public mailing list
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public

2007/12/13, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
> > On Nov 28, 2007 7:11 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Nov 28, 2007 1:39 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Simple upgrade, with a few minor backend features, and removed the
> >>> DEBUG flag from the build.
> >>>
> >>> If you upgrade and pacman can still download things, we're in business.
> >>
> >> Good here for i686.
> >
> > Poke poke - this has been in testing for too long. If you've been
> > using pacman all this time, then it works fine - please signoff.
> >
>
> signing off for both arches.
>

signed off (i686).

--
Roman Kyrylych (Ð*оман Кирилич)
_______________________________________________
arch-dev-public mailing list
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public

On Dec 13, 2007 4:02 AM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/12/13, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
> > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 28, 2007 7:11 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Nov 28, 2007 1:39 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> Simple upgrade, with a few minor backend features, and removed the
> > >>> DEBUG flag from the build.
> > >>>
> > >>> If you upgrade and pacman can still download things, we're in business.
> > >>
> > >> Good here for i686.
> > >
> > > Poke poke - this has been in testing for too long. If you've been
> > > using pacman all this time, then it works fine - please signoff.
> > >
> >
> > signing off for both arches.
> >
>
> signed off (i686).

Um...ping? This getting moved anytime soon?

-Dan

Thursday 03 January 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
| On Dec 13, 2007 4:02 AM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com>
wrote:
| > 2007/12/13, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
| > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:
| > > > On Nov 28, 2007 7:11 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
| > > >> On Nov 28, 2007 1:39 AM, Aaron Griffin
<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
| > > >>> Simple upgrade, with a few minor backend features, and
| > > >>> removed the DEBUG flag from the build.
| > > >>>
| > > >>> If you upgrade and pacman can still download things, we're
| > > >>> in business.
| > > >>
| > > >> Good here for i686.
| > > >
| > > > Poke poke - this has been in testing for too long. If you've
| > > > been using pacman all this time, then it works fine - please
| > > > signoff.
| > >
| > > signing off for both arches.
| >
| > signed off (i686).
|
| Um...ping? This getting moved anytime soon?

no trouble on x86_64 yet (bzip and gzip)... but i do not feel
competent enough to test it profoundly, to be honest.

- D


--
.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸ .·´
° ° °
° ° °
><((((º> ° °
° °
° <º)))><
<º)))><

On Jan 2, 2008 7:32 PM, Damir Perisa <damir.perisa@solnet.ch> wrote:
>
> Thursday 03 January 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
> | On Dec 13, 2007 4:02 AM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> | > 2007/12/13, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
> | > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> | > > > On Nov 28, 2007 7:11 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
> | > > >> On Nov 28, 2007 1:39 AM, Aaron Griffin
> <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> | > > >>> Simple upgrade, with a few minor backend features, and
> | > > >>> removed the DEBUG flag from the build.
> | > > >>>
> | > > >>> If you upgrade and pacman can still download things, we're
> | > > >>> in business.
> | > > >>
> | > > >> Good here for i686.
> | > > >
> | > > > Poke poke - this has been in testing for too long. If you've
> | > > > been using pacman all this time, then it works fine - please
> | > > > signoff.
> | > >
> | > > signing off for both arches.
> | >
> | > signed off (i686).
> |
> | Um...ping? This getting moved anytime soon?
>
> no trouble on x86_64 yet (bzip and gzip)... but i do not feel
> competent enough to test it profoundly, to be honest.

I'm guessing you got confused with libarchive. This is actually
really old and is the signoff for libdownload. I've just pushed it to
core for both architectures as it seems we had enough signoffs, and we
are all responsible anyway.

-Dan

On Jan 2, 2008 7:39 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm guessing you got confused with libarchive. This is actually
> really old and is the signoff for libdownload. I've just pushed it to
> core for both architectures as it seems we had enough signoffs, and we
> are all responsible anyway.

Yeah, I have a few of these I mentally lost over the holidays

For the record, the new dashboard lists packages by repository, so
this should help me in keeping track of signoffs and what needs to
move better (gmail isn't cutting it for that task).

In the (near?) future I want to integrate signoffs into the dashboard,
which would make this far easier.