rc.conf cleanup why?
I should add: the reason I prefer manages rather than comments is that they
can be more verbose and updated more frequently.
On Jul 19, 2012 11:55 AM, "Tom Gundersen" <email@example.com> wrote:
> I'd like to nudge people into thinking twice before using these options.
> In addition to documenting what options exist, the man page also explains
> why you should not use them.
> As of the next release initscripts will do the right thing when rc.conf is
> I also started adding warnings whenever people have
> contradictory/nonsensical options specified (usually solved by deleting the
> On Jul 19, 2012 7:58 AM, "Tobias Powalowski" <
> firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I don't think this is a good idea, I liked the described options in
>> rc.conf. Now you have to switch to an other terminal to read what
>> options are possible.
>> pacman.conf and makepackage.conf also have comments on important
>> options, so why remove parameters from the most important config file?