Hi guys,

The libarchive rebuild was small, so I figured I'd knock it out myself.
The majority of it is now in [staging] alongside the db rebuild. There
shouldn't be any issues with this because there's no overlap between the
two. That is to say, they can move to [testing] independently of each
other.

2 packages I did not rebuild yet: kdeutils-ark, hydrogen.

kdeutils-ark: @andrea, you did a version bump on the PKGBUILD in SVN, but
never released this? Was there something you were waiting on? I didn't
want to push this without talking to you first. I've got time today to
do this if you're busy and just want to give the ok.

hydrogen: @ray: I'm getting build errors from scons in the package
function, and I'm not sure where to go with them. I figured you might
know how to get around this.

Cheers,
Dave

On 2 January 2012 21:20, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
> 2 packages I did not rebuild yet: kdeutils-ark, hydrogen.
>
> kdeutils-ark: @andrea, you did a version bump on the PKGBUILD in SVN, but
> never released this? Was there something you were waiting on? I didn't
> want to push this without talking to you first. I've got time today to
> do this if you're busy and just want to give the ok.
I'm on it right now.
I've to bump the pkgrel in kdeutils/repos/extra-{i686,x86_64},
kdeutils-ark/kde-unstable/trunk is for the kde-unstable version.

--
Andrea

On 3 January 2012 09:08, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@archlinux.org> wrote:
> I'm on it right now.
> I've to bump the pkgrel in kdeutils/repos/extra-{i686,x86_64},
> kdeutils-ark/kde-unstable/trunk is for the kde-unstable version.
Sorry I written too fast, I mean staging-{i686,x86_64} here.

--
Andrea

On 3 January 2012 04:20, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
> hydrogen: @ray: I'm getting build errors from scons in the package
> function, and I'm not sure where to go with them. I figured you might
> know how to get around this.

Thanks for the heads-up, will take a look.


--
GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1

On 3 January 2012 19:48, Ray Rashif <schiv@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 3 January 2012 04:20, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
>> hydrogen: @ray: I'm getting build errors from scons in the package
>> function, and I'm not sure where to go with them. I figured you might
>> know how to get around this.
>
> Thanks for the heads-up, will take a look.
>
>
> --
> GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1

Sorry forgot to push and then forgot to mark as complete. All done now.

--
GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1

On Jan 4, 2012 7:27 AM, "Ray Rashif" <schiv@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> On 3 January 2012 19:48, Ray Rashif <schiv@archlinux.org> wrote:
> > On 3 January 2012 04:20, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
> >> hydrogen: @ray: I'm getting build errors from scons in the package
> >> function, and I'm not sure where to go with them. I figured you might
> >> know how to get around this.
> >
> > Thanks for the heads-up, will take a look.
> >
> >
> > --
> > GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
>
> Sorry forgot to push and then forgot to mark as complete. All done now.
>
> --
> GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1

Great. I'll move this into testing this morning then and keep an eye out
for signoffs over the course of the week.

Dave

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2012 7:27 AM, "Ray Rashif" <schiv@archlinux.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 3 January 2012 19:48, Ray Rashif <schiv@archlinux.org> wrote:
>> > On 3 January 2012 04:20, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
>> >> hydrogen: @ray: I'm getting build errors from scons in the package
>> >> function, and I'm not sure where to go with them. I figured you might
>> >> know how to get around this.
>> >
>> > Thanks for the heads-up, will take a look.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
>>
>> Sorry forgot to push and then forgot to mark as complete. All done now.
>>
>> --
>> GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
>
> Great. I'll move this into testing this morning then and keep an eye out
> for signoffs over the course of the week.
>
> Dave

I'm not sure why but vdrift is still marked as incomplete in the todo
list and it doesn't seem that it was rebuilt. Was it forgotten?

Eric

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 4, 2012 7:27 AM, "Ray Rashif" <schiv@archlinux.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3 January 2012 19:48, Ray Rashif <schiv@archlinux.org> wrote:
>>> > On 3 January 2012 04:20, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
>>> >> hydrogen: @ray: I'm getting build errors from scons in the package
>>> >> function, and I'm not sure where to go with them. I figured you might
>>> >> know how to get around this.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for the heads-up, will take a look.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
>>>
>>> Sorry forgot to push and then forgot to mark as complete. All done now.
>>>
>>> --
>>> GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
>>
>> Great. I'll move this into testing this morning then and keep an eye out
>> for signoffs over the course of the week.
>>
>> Dave
>
> I'm not sure why but vdrift is still marked as incomplete in the todo
> list and it doesn't seem that it was rebuilt. Was it forgotten?

It just got added due to a conversation in IRC and running of sogrep
in community- the package is completely missing the dependency
apparently. Not sure if anyone volunteered to rebuild (or confirmed it
is actually broken?).

-Dan