libnl 1.1-3
Hi,
this is another simple rebuild of an old package. Note that I reverted the changes in trunk which already had version 2.0 which we will most likely skip due to problems. Please signoff, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre |
libnl 1.1-3
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:35:49PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Hi, > > this is another simple rebuild of an old package. Note that I reverted > the changes in trunk which already had version 2.0 which we will most > likely skip due to problems. > > Please signoff, > > Pierre > > -- > Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre signoff x86_64. dave |
libnl 1.1-3
On 10/09/11 21:35, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Hi, this is another simple rebuild of an old package. Note that I reverted the changes in trunk which already had version 2.0 which we will most likely skip due to problems. Please signoff, Pierre Signoff i686, Allan |
libnl 1.1-3
[2011-09-10 13:35:49 +0200] Pierre Schmitz:
> this is another simple rebuild of an old package. Note that I reverted > the changes in trunk which already had version 2.0 which we will most > likely skip due to problems. Signoff both. -- Gaetan |
libnl 1.1-3
Am 10.09.2011 13:35, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> Hi, > > this is another simple rebuild of an old package. Note that I reverted > the changes in trunk which already had version 2.0 which we will most > likely skip due to problems. > > Please signoff, > > Pierre Note: Ioni noticed that libnl 3 is out, and that networkmanager has a branch that supports it. As nm was the only real blocker for libnl 2, we could try switching once again - I won't have the time for that in the next months though, so anyone else is free to go ahead. |
libnl 1.1-3
On 09/11/2011 11:56 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 10.09.2011 13:35, schrieb Pierre Schmitz: Hi, this is another simple rebuild of an old package. Note that I reverted the changes in trunk which already had version 2.0 which we will most likely skip due to problems. Please signoff, Pierre Note: Ioni noticed that libnl 3 is out, and that networkmanager has a branch that supports it. As nm was the only real blocker for libnl 2, we could try switching once again - I won't have the time for that in the next months though, so anyone else is free to go ahead. that branch was merged in master and 0.9.1 is going to include it. -- IonuÈ› |
libnl 1.1-3
On 11.09.2011 22:56, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 10.09.2011 13:35, schrieb Pierre Schmitz: >> Hi, >> >> this is another simple rebuild of an old package. Note that I reverted >> the changes in trunk which already had version 2.0 which we will most >> likely skip due to problems. >> >> Please signoff, >> >> Pierre > > Note: Ioni noticed that libnl 3 is out, and that networkmanager has a > branch that supports it. As nm was the only real blocker for libnl 2, we > could try switching once again - I won't have the time for that in the > next months though, so anyone else is free to go ahead. I've started testing what works and created a wiki page [1] containing the information. IMHO we should not waste time rebuilding for libnl2 because libnl3 will have a stable API [2]. [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Rebuilds:Libnl3 [2] http://canuck.infradead.org/pipermail/libnl/2011-March/000218.html -- Florian Pritz |
libnl 1.1-3
Am 12.09.2011 22:28, schrieb Florian Pritz:
> I've started testing what works and created a wiki page [1] containing > the information. IMHO we should not waste time rebuilding for libnl2 > because libnl3 will have a stable API [2]. > > [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Rebuilds:Libnl3 wpa_supplicant doesn't look too hard to fix. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:27 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.