Hi,

I would like to add alpine to the extra repo where it will replace pine
which is no longer being developped. Reference: FS#9040.


Any objections?

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

On Feb 2, 2008 11:48 AM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:

Hi,

I would like to add alpine to the extra repo where it will replace pine
which is no longer being developped. Reference: FS#9040.

Any objections?

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and

dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

None whatsoever ..

Varun

2008/2/2, Varun Acharya <ganja.guru.x64@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
> On Feb 2, 2008 11:48 AM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to add alpine to the extra repo where it will replace pine
> > which is no longer being developped. Reference: FS#9040.
> >
> > Any objections?
>
> None whatsoever ..
>

Go Eric, go! :-)

--
Roman Kyrylych (Ð*оман Кирилич)

Eric Belanger wrote:

Hi,

I would like to add alpine to the extra repo where it will replace pine
which is no longer being developped. Reference: FS#9040.


+2, the second for encouragement!

Can we leave pine there too for a little while until people have had a
chance to transition?


- P

Paul Mattal schrieb:
> Eric Belanger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to add alpine to the extra repo where it will replace
>> pine which is no longer being developped. Reference: FS#9040.
>
> +2, the second for encouragement!
>
> Can we leave pine there too for a little while until people have had a
> chance to transition?

I don't see the need: pine is no longer being developped, so there will
be no updates. People who already have it installed will need a
transition, people who don't will immediately start with alpine. A
package in the repository is no longer needed.

On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Thomas Bächler wrote:


Paul Mattal schrieb:

Eric Belanger wrote:

Hi,

I would like to add alpine to the extra repo where it will replace
pine which is no longer being developped. Reference: FS#9040.


+2, the second for encouragement!

Can we leave pine there too for a little while until people have had a
chance to transition?


I don't see the need: pine is no longer being developped, so there will
be no updates. People who already have it installed will need a
transition, people who don't will immediately start with alpine. A
package in the repository is no longer needed.




If it would be better, I could add alpine to testing first with the
replace line in and keep pine in extra. And after 1-2 weeks , move alpine
to extra and remove pine. That might ease up the transition but I agree
with Thomas here.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

On Feb 3, 2008 3:29 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
> > Paul Mattal schrieb:
> >> Eric Belanger wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I would like to add alpine to the extra repo where it will replace
> >>> pine which is no longer being developped. Reference: FS#9040.
> >>
> >> +2, the second for encouragement!
> >>
> >> Can we leave pine there too for a little while until people have had a
> >> chance to transition?
> >
> > I don't see the need: pine is no longer being developped, so there will
> > be no updates. People who already have it installed will need a
> > transition, people who don't will immediately start with alpine. A
> > package in the repository is no longer needed.
> >
> >
>
> If it would be better, I could add alpine to testing first with the
> replace line in and keep pine in extra. And after 1-2 weeks , move alpine
> to extra and remove pine. That might ease up the transition but I agree
> with Thomas here.

I agree with you two as well. pine users should know what they're
doing anyway, so a transition shouldn't be hard

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:


On Feb 3, 2008 3:29 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:


On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Thomas Bächler wrote:


Paul Mattal schrieb:

Eric Belanger wrote:

Hi,

I would like to add alpine to the extra repo where it will replace
pine which is no longer being developped. Reference: FS#9040.


+2, the second for encouragement!

Can we leave pine there too for a little while until people have had a
chance to transition?


I don't see the need: pine is no longer being developped, so there will
be no updates. People who already have it installed will need a
transition, people who don't will immediately start with alpine. A
package in the repository is no longer needed.




If it would be better, I could add alpine to testing first with the
replace line in and keep pine in extra. And after 1-2 weeks , move alpine
to extra and remove pine. That might ease up the transition but I agree
with Thomas here.


I agree with you two as well. pine users should know what they're
doing anyway, so a transition shouldn't be hard




Should alpine go straight in extra or in testing first?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Eric Belanger wrote:

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:

On Feb 3, 2008 3:29 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>
wrote:


On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Thomas Bächler wrote:


Paul Mattal schrieb:

Eric Belanger wrote:

Hi,

I would like to add alpine to the extra repo where it will replace
pine which is no longer being developped. Reference: FS#9040.


+2, the second for encouragement!

Can we leave pine there too for a little while until people have had a
chance to transition?


I don't see the need: pine is no longer being developped, so there will
be no updates. People who already have it installed will need a
transition, people who don't will immediately start with alpine. A
package in the repository is no longer needed.




If it would be better, I could add alpine to testing first with the
replace line in and keep pine in extra. And after 1-2 weeks , move
alpine

to extra and remove pine. That might ease up the transition but I agree
with Thomas here.


I agree with you two as well. pine users should know what they're
doing anyway, so a transition shouldn't be hard




Should alpine go straight in extra or in testing first?


I'd say let's just drop it in testing for a short stint. I'll use a
guy in our office as a test case upgrade.


- P

On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Paul Mattal wrote:


Eric Belanger wrote:

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:


On Feb 3, 2008 3:29 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:


On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Thomas Bächler wrote:


Paul Mattal schrieb:

Eric Belanger wrote:

Hi,

I would like to add alpine to the extra repo where it will replace
pine which is no longer being developped. Reference: FS#9040.


+2, the second for encouragement!

Can we leave pine there too for a little while until people have had a
chance to transition?


I don't see the need: pine is no longer being developped, so there will
be no updates. People who already have it installed will need a
transition, people who don't will immediately start with alpine. A
package in the repository is no longer needed.




If it would be better, I could add alpine to testing first with the
replace line in and keep pine in extra. And after 1-2 weeks , move
alpine

to extra and remove pine. That might ease up the transition but I agree
with Thomas here.


I agree with you two as well. pine users should know what they're
doing anyway, so a transition shouldn't be hard




Should alpine go straight in extra or in testing first?


I'd say let's just drop it in testing for a short stint. I'll use a guy in
our office as a test case upgrade.


- P



OK, it's in testing for both arches.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.