FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 05-10-2010, 05:03 PM
Andrea Scarpino
 
Default popt 1.16-2

On Monday 10 May 2010 18:40:16 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> According to this:
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-May/016721.html
>
> Can you please move libpopt.so* from /usr/lib to /lib? This would be
> important for the next cryptsetup release to move to core.
>
>
> Remark: To ensure proper dynamic linking, it should look like this:
> /usr/lib/libpopt.a
> /usr/lib/libpopt.so -> /lib/libpopt.so
> /lib/libpopt.so -> libpopt.so.0
> /lib/libpopt.so.0 -> libpopt.so.0.X.Y
> /lib/libpopt.so.0.X.Y
>
> Without the libpopt.so symlink in /usr/lib/, the linker will always
> choose the static library over the dynamic one on build-time. I ran into
> problems with this a lot already
libpopt.so* moved to /lib.

please signoff both

--
Andrea Scarpino - andreascarpino.it
KDE Maintainer in Arch Linux
 
Old 05-10-2010, 06:48 PM
 
Default popt 1.16-2

On Mon, 10 May 2010 19:03:59 +0200, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@archlinux.org>
wrote:
> On Monday 10 May 2010 18:40:16 Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> According to this:
>>
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-May/016721.html
>>
>> Can you please move libpopt.so* from /usr/lib to /lib? This would be
>> important for the next cryptsetup release to move to core.
>>
>>
>> Remark: To ensure proper dynamic linking, it should look like this:
>> /usr/lib/libpopt.a
>> /usr/lib/libpopt.so -> /lib/libpopt.so
>> /lib/libpopt.so -> libpopt.so.0
>> /lib/libpopt.so.0 -> libpopt.so.0.X.Y
>> /lib/libpopt.so.0.X.Y
>>
>> Without the libpopt.so symlink in /usr/lib/, the linker will always
>> choose the static library over the dynamic one on build-time. I ran
into
>> problems with this a lot already
> libpopt.so* moved to /lib.
>
> please signoff both

You moved libpopt.so to /lib also, this was supposed to be in /usr/lib
still.
 
Old 05-10-2010, 06:50 PM
 
Default popt 1.16-2

On Mon, 10 May 2010 20:48:42 +0200, <jan@jgc.homeip.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 2010 19:03:59 +0200, Andrea Scarpino
<andrea@archlinux.org>
> wrote:
>> On Monday 10 May 2010 18:40:16 Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>> According to this:
>>>
>
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-May/016721.html
>>>
>>> Can you please move libpopt.so* from /usr/lib to /lib? This would be
>>> important for the next cryptsetup release to move to core.
>>>
>>>
>>> Remark: To ensure proper dynamic linking, it should look like this:
>>> /usr/lib/libpopt.a
>>> /usr/lib/libpopt.so -> /lib/libpopt.so
>>> /lib/libpopt.so -> libpopt.so.0
>>> /lib/libpopt.so.0 -> libpopt.so.0.X.Y
>>> /lib/libpopt.so.0.X.Y
>>>
>>> Without the libpopt.so symlink in /usr/lib/, the linker will always
>>> choose the static library over the dynamic one on build-time. I ran
> into
>>> problems with this a lot already
>> libpopt.so* moved to /lib.
>>
>> please signoff both
>
> You moved libpopt.so to /lib also, this was supposed to be in /usr/lib
> still.

Never mind, I looked incorrectly
 
Old 05-10-2010, 08:40 PM
Thomas Bächler
 
Default popt 1.16-2

Am 10.05.2010 19:03, schrieb Andrea Scarpino:
> On Monday 10 May 2010 18:40:16 Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> According to this:
>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-May/016721.html
>>
>> Can you please move libpopt.so* from /usr/lib to /lib? This would be
>> important for the next cryptsetup release to move to core.
>>
>>
>> Remark: To ensure proper dynamic linking, it should look like this:
>> /usr/lib/libpopt.a
>> /usr/lib/libpopt.so -> /lib/libpopt.so
>> /lib/libpopt.so -> libpopt.so.0
>> /lib/libpopt.so.0 -> libpopt.so.0.X.Y
>> /lib/libpopt.so.0.X.Y
>>
>> Without the libpopt.so symlink in /usr/lib/, the linker will always
>> choose the static library over the dynamic one on build-time. I ran into
>> problems with this a lot already
> libpopt.so* moved to /lib.
>
> please signoff both
>

Thanks - looks fine, signoff x86_64.
 
Old 05-10-2010, 10:52 PM
Andrea Scarpino
 
Default popt 1.16-2

On Monday 10 May 2010 22:40:55 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Thanks - looks fine, signoff x86_64.
Thomas, you are free to adopt popt if you want.

--
Andrea Scarpino - andreascarpino.it
KDE Maintainer in Arch Linux
 
Old 05-11-2010, 07:18 AM
Thomas Bächler
 
Default popt 1.16-2

Am 11.05.2010 00:52, schrieb Andrea Scarpino:
> On Monday 10 May 2010 22:40:55 Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Thanks - looks fine, signoff x86_64.
> Thomas, you are free to adopt popt if you want.
>

No, thanks.
 
Old 05-13-2010, 11:01 AM
Andrea Scarpino
 
Default popt 1.16-2

On Monday May 10 2010 22:40:55 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Thanks - looks fine, signoff x86_64.
some i686?

--
Andrea Scarpino - andreascarpino.it
KDE Maintainer in Arch Linux
 
Old 05-13-2010, 11:11 AM
Allan McRae
 
Default popt 1.16-2

On 13/05/10 21:01, Andrea Scarpino wrote:

On Monday May 10 2010 22:40:55 Thomas Bächler wrote:

Thanks - looks fine, signoff x86_64.

some i686?


signoff i686
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 07:45 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org