On 04/10/10 at 01:24am, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> Please start threads regarding [community] packages on aur-general so
> that other TUs can respond. I didn't notice I was replying to
> arch-dev-public and got my message bounced.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Evangelos Foutras <email@example.com>
> Date: Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] raggle: drop pkg to AUR?
> To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > I'm currently maintaining raggle, which has been abandoned
> > upstream for some time. The recent rebuild of ruby broke it
> > horribly and thus far I have been unable to patch it in
> > such a way that it functions as expected. I hate to remove
> > this package as it seems to be quite popular, but given
> > its condition and upstream status, I think removal to AUR
> > is best unless someone else can provide a working patch.
> > Thoughts?
> > --
> It doesn't seem to be popular; it has 0.29% usage according to pkgstats.
> I'd say drop it.
My bad... Honestly forgot I was sending to arch-dev-public. :P