replacing syslog-ng with rsyslog
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Paul Mattal <email@example.com> wrote:
> There's been some compelling arguments made in the below bug request to
> switch from syslog-ng to rsyslog:
> I'm planning to start the process of migrating to rsyslog in March, if a
> rough show of hands here confirms it's the right thing to do.
> Can people give a quick +1 or -1 to this idea?
A quick read of the bug report gets a +1 from me.