On Jan 9, 2008 10:31 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:


Ah good catch, I was not aware of these two deps not being in extra. Silly me.

So guys: adding gnucash to extra would pull in these two deps. Is this
still acceptable?


slib depends on guile, so thats fine by me.

But aqbanking depends upon -> 'gwenhywfar'* 'ktoblzcheck' 'libofx' .... and all these packages are in community


So to bring in gnucash, we need 5 other packages bought into extra. Sorry I'll have to withdraw the +1 Aaron, I'd rather this one stays in community.

Varun

On Jan 9, 2008 12:54 PM, Varun Acharya <ganja.guru.x64@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2008 10:31 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ah good catch, I was not aware of these two deps not being in extra. Silly
> me.
> >
> > So guys: adding gnucash to extra would pull in these two deps. Is this
> > still acceptable?
> >
>
>
> slib depends on guile, so thats fine by me.
>
> But aqbanking depends upon -> 'gwenhywfar' 'ktoblzcheck' 'libofx' .... and
> all these packages are in community

Is aqbanking a hard or soft dep? ie. if we compile gnucash with
aqbanking support, will it run if aqbanking is not installed?

Optionally, we can just remove the --enable-aqbanking configure flag,
and we win.

2008/1/9, Varun Acharya <ganja.guru.x64@gmail.com>:
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2008 10:31 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ah good catch, I was not aware of these two deps not being in extra. Silly
> me.
> >
> > So guys: adding gnucash to extra would pull in these two deps. Is this
> > still acceptable?
> >
>
> slib depends on guile, so thats fine by me.
>
> But aqbanking depends upon -> 'gwenhywfar' 'ktoblzcheck' 'libofx' .... and
> all these packages are in community
>
> So to bring in gnucash, we need 5 other packages bought into extra. Sorry
> I'll have to withdraw the +1 Aaron, I'd rather this one stays in community.
>
> Varun
>

I don't have anything against gnucash but many dependencies scare me.

--
Roman Kyrylych (Ð*оман Кирилич)

On Jan 9, 2008 11:54 AM, Varun Acharya <ganja.guru.x64@gmail.com> wrote:
> But aqbanking depends upon -> 'gwenhywfar' 'ktoblzcheck' 'libofx' .... and
> all these packages are in community
>
> So to bring in gnucash, we need 5 other packages bought into extra. Sorry
> I'll have to withdraw the +1 Aaron, I'd rather this one stays in community.

Oh man, all of the sudden this is getting scary. As Travis mentioned,
is there a big deal with leaving off the aqbanking support? Or should
we leave it in unsupported where it is now?

2008/1/9, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:
> On Jan 9, 2008 11:54 AM, Varun Acharya <ganja.guru.x64@gmail.com> wrote:
> > But aqbanking depends upon -> 'gwenhywfar' 'ktoblzcheck' 'libofx' .... and
> > all these packages are in community
> >
> > So to bring in gnucash, we need 5 other packages bought into extra. Sorry
> > I'll have to withdraw the +1 Aaron, I'd rather this one stays in community.
>
> Oh man, all of the sudden this is getting scary. As Travis mentioned,
> is there a big deal with leaving off the aqbanking support? Or should
> we leave it in unsupported where it is now?
>

I don't use gnucash (yet?) and thus don't know how important is
aqbanking support.
If it's not and dependency list will be much lower without it - extra is ok,
if it's important, then leaving gnucash in unsupported (or moving to
community?) would be better, I guess.

--
Roman Kyrylych (Ð*оман Кирилич)

On Jan 9, 2008 11:36 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 9, 2008 11:54 AM, Varun Acharya <ganja.guru.x64@gmail.com> wrote:
> But aqbanking depends upon -> 'gwenhywfar' *'ktoblzcheck' 'libofx' .... and

> all these packages are in community
>
> So to bring in gnucash, we need 5 other packages bought into extra. Sorry
> I'll have to withdraw the +1 Aaron, I'd rather this one stays in community.


Oh man, all of the sudden this is getting scary. As Travis mentioned,
is there a big deal with leaving off the aqbanking support? Or should
we leave it in unsupported where it is now?


Why not ask the AUR maintainer?

Wednesday 09 January 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
| So guys: adding gnucash to extra would pull in these two deps. Is
| this still acceptable?

yes it is. (they are being maintained)

- D

--
.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸ .·´
° ° °
° ° °
><((((º> ° °
° °
° <º)))><
<º)))><