WARNING libpng/libjpeg hits testing
 

hi,
just a heads up to inform that i don't recommend to update from testing
anymore. Most of important packages have been rebuild but the remaining
list still counts ~99 packages.


--
Ionut

WARNING libpng/libjpeg hits testing
 

On 01/19/2010 03:15 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:

hi,
just a heads up to inform that i don't recommend to update from testing
anymore. Most of important packages have been rebuild but the remaining
list still counts ~99 packages.



i'm going to move them now.

--
Ionut

WARNING libpng/libjpeg hits testing
 

2010/1/19 Ionut Biru <biru.ionut@gmail.com>:
> i'm going to move them now.
Packages are still in jpng directory, there is a reason for this?
Also, ArchitectureDifference shows that there are still some package
on [jpng] x86_64.

--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer

WARNING libpng/libjpeg hits testing
 

On 01/19/2010 05:59 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:

2010/1/19 Ionut Biru<biru.ionut@gmail.com>:

i'm going to move them now.

Packages are still in jpng directory, there is a reason for this?
Also, ArchitectureDifference shows that there are still some package
on [jpng] x86_64.


in jpng x86_64 there is one package and in i686 none.
i think ArchitectureDifference is broken somehow or i miss something...

--
Ionut

WARNING libpng/libjpeg hits testing
 

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Ionut Biru <biru.ionut@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/19/2010 05:59 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>>
>> 2010/1/19 Ionut Biru<biru.ionut@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> i'm going to move them now.
>>
>> Packages are still in jpng directory, there is a reason for this?
>> Also, ArchitectureDifference shows that there are still some package
>> on [jpng] x86_64.
>>
> in jpng x86_64 there is one package and in i686 none.
> i think ArchitectureDifference is broken somehow or i miss something...
>
> --
> Ionut
>

Now, that they are moved to testing, can we completely remove the jpng
repo? The cleanup script complains about it:

Scan complete for jpng (i686) at /srv/ftp/jpng/os/i686
The following files are missing in the repo
/tmp/cleanup-IY1z7V/*.pkg.tar.gz

Scan complete for jpng (x86_64) at /srv/ftp/jpng/os/x86_64
The following files are missing in the repo
/tmp/cleanup-2xEQKi/*.pkg.tar.gz

WARNING libpng/libjpeg hits testing
 

Eric Bélanger wrote:

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Ionut Biru <biru.ionut@gmail.com> wrote:

On 01/19/2010 05:59 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:

2010/1/19 Ionut Biru<biru.ionut@gmail.com>:

i'm going to move them now.

Packages are still in jpng directory, there is a reason for this?
Also, ArchitectureDifference shows that there are still some package
on [jpng] x86_64.


in jpng x86_64 there is one package and in i686 none.
i think ArchitectureDifference is broken somehow or i miss something...

--
Ionut



Now, that they are moved to testing, can we completely remove the jpng
repo? The cleanup script complains about it:

Scan complete for jpng (i686) at /srv/ftp/jpng/os/i686
The following files are missing in the repo
/tmp/cleanup-IY1z7V/*.pkg.tar.gz

Scan complete for jpng (x86_64) at /srv/ftp/jpng/os/x86_64
The following files are missing in the repo
/tmp/cleanup-2xEQKi/*.pkg.tar.gz



It is now gone.

Allan

WARNING libpng/libjpeg hits testing
 

Am Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 02:15:10 schrieb Ionut Biru:
> hi,
> just a heads up to inform that i don't recommend to update from testing
> anymore. Most of important packages have been rebuild but the remaining
> list still counts ~99 packages.

Do you guys think we can finish this rebuild this week? I think it's a good
idea to put KDE 4.4 RC3 into testing when the jpng rebuild has moved into
extra. This way we have some time to do some KDE related rebuilds and have the
packages tested by more people.

Pierre

--

Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

WARNING libpng/libjpeg hits testing
 

On 27/01/10 09:56, Pierre Schmitz wrote:

Am Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 02:15:10 schrieb Ionut Biru:

hi,
just a heads up to inform that i don't recommend to update from testing
anymore. Most of important packages have been rebuild but the remaining
list still counts ~99 packages.


Do you guys think we can finish this rebuild this week? I think it's a good
idea to put KDE 4.4 RC3 into testing when the jpng rebuild has moved into
extra. This way we have some time to do some KDE related rebuilds and have the
packages tested by more people.



Sure, apart from some of the openoffice variants, there is only 5 or 6
packages left to go. I think Andy was holding out for a release to
finish the OOo stuff.


Allan

WARNING libpng/libjpeg hits testing
 

Am Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2010 01:03:09 schrieb Allan McRae:
> Sure, apart from some of the openoffice variants, there is only 5 or 6
> packages left to go. I think Andy was holding out for a release to
> finish the OOo stuff.

I wonder how long we have to wait here. They just released RC4 and told that
the final release was delayed. I guess it's a lot longer than it would take to
build it for i686 (x86_64 is already done)

--

Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

WARNING libpng/libjpeg hits testing
 

On 01/27/2010 02:03 AM, Allan McRae wrote:

On 27/01/10 09:56, Pierre Schmitz wrote:

Am Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 02:15:10 schrieb Ionut Biru:

hi,
just a heads up to inform that i don't recommend to update from testing
anymore. Most of important packages have been rebuild but the remaining
list still counts ~99 packages.


Do you guys think we can finish this rebuild this week? I think it's a
good
idea to put KDE 4.4 RC3 into testing when the jpng rebuild has moved into
extra. This way we have some time to do some KDE related rebuilds and
have the
packages tested by more people.



Sure, apart from some of the openoffice variants, there is only 5 or 6
packages left to go. I think Andy was holding out for a release to
finish the OOo stuff.

Allan


we can start accepting bugs no? as the others:

last-exit dead upstream
panda3d will be moved in arch-games
visualboyadvance need a patch( Daenyth is working on it
xf4vnc-xvnc moved in aur

what do you think, is better to announce on news that a possible
breakage can be if they use other cairo package? i found a lot of users
who had that problem.


--
Ionut