Am 09.01.2010 18:06, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> This is a bugfix release which (among other less important things) fixed
> the early userspace firmware loading problem. Please sign off.

Two minor bugs fixed from 0.5.27, most importantly
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17793. Please sign off.

> This will hopefully be the last release before we move to 0.6, which
> will have all klibc dependencies removed, see
> http://projects.archlinux.org/mkinitcpio.git/?h=kill-klibc for progress.
> Any contributions here are welcome, nothing works yet.

I think what we have now in the kill-klibc branch might actually boot in
a standard setup (no raid, nfs, lvm, encryption), but I didn't try. I'll
keep you posted.

On 12/01/2010 11:03 πμ, Thomas Bächler wrote:

I think what we have now in the kill-klibc branch might actually boot in
a standard setup (no raid, nfs, lvm, encryption), but I didn't try. I'll
keep you posted.


I gave it a try in a VM but it still fails with "Failed to execute
/init" like last time (http://i.imgur.com/h6xDu.png).


The mkinicpio revision I tried was 54fd032, along with latest
mkinitcpio-busybox/trunk. The command used to generate the initramfs
image was `./mkinitcpio -g /boot/kernel26.img' from within the cloned
Git repository (switched to the kill-klibc branch).


Let me know if I can help with further testing.

Am 12.01.2010 15:07, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
> On 12/01/2010 11:03 πμ, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> I think what we have now in the kill-klibc branch might actually boot in
>> a standard setup (no raid, nfs, lvm, encryption), but I didn't try. I'll
>> keep you posted.
>
> I gave it a try in a VM but it still fails with "Failed to execute
> /init" like last time (http://i.imgur.com/h6xDu.png).
>
> The mkinicpio revision I tried was 54fd032, along with latest
> mkinitcpio-busybox/trunk. The command used to generate the initramfs
> image was `./mkinitcpio -g /boot/kernel26.img' from within the cloned
> Git repository (switched to the kill-klibc branch).
>
> Let me know if I can help with further testing.
>

Okay, that is weird, I guess I will have to try myself this week, when I
get to it.

Am 12.01.2010 10:03, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> Am 09.01.2010 18:06, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
>> This is a bugfix release which (among other less important things) fixed
>> the early userspace firmware loading problem. Please sign off.
>
> Two minor bugs fixed from 0.5.27, most importantly
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17793. Please sign off.

Anyone?

2010/1/13, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org>:
> Anyone?

Signoff x86_64


--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Giovanni Scafora
<giovanni@archlinux.org> wrote:
> 2010/1/13, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org>:
>> *Anyone?
>
> Signoff x86_64
>
>
> --
> Arch Linux Developer
> http://www.archlinux.org
> http://www.archlinux.it
>

signoff i686 with lvm hook