libpng todo list
On 01/09/2010 02:24 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote: On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Jan de Groot <jan@jgc.homeip.net> wrote: I just created a todo list containing 163 packages. This todo list contains all packages that link to libpng and that should get rebuilt when we update to libpng 1.4.0. *shudder* And that does not include [community]... When do you want to start this? In particular, do we get the ffmpeg/x264 rebuilds done a moved from [testing] first? Allan yes. i'll do them later today. i just have to add fixes(feature requests) that are on bugtracker. -- Ionut |
libpng todo list
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 10:24 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> When do you want to start this? In particular, do we get the > ffmpeg/x264 rebuilds done a moved from [testing] first? I just made the todo list to show how much work is involved in this. Rebuilding 163 packages requires some serious planning. I can dedicate the next weekend for Archlinux, I almost have a full weekend including friday available. My core2quad is idle at this moment, it could use some build tasks ;) As for community: that takes 145 rebuilds. I could help out a bit on that also, but I have no idea about our community infrastructure, I never built any package for AUR or community before. |
libpng todo list
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 19:01 -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 16:59, Jan de Groot <jan@jgc.homeip.net> wrote: > > I just created a todo list containing 163 packages. This todo list > > contains all packages that link to libpng and that should get rebuilt > > when we update to libpng 1.4.0. > What is the new soname? I'd like to make a list for arch-games as well. libpng.so.3 is gone libpng12.so.0 is gone new soname: libpng14.so.*, no symlink to libpng.so.3 |
libpng todo list
On 09/01/2010 11:12, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 10:24 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: When do you want to start this? In particular, do we get the ffmpeg/x264 rebuilds done a moved from [testing] first? I just made the todo list to show how much work is involved in this. Rebuilding 163 packages requires some serious planning. I can dedicate the next weekend for Archlinux, I almost have a full weekend including friday available. My core2quad is idle at this moment, it could use some build tasks ;) As for community: that takes 145 rebuilds. I could help out a bit on that also, but I have no idea about our community infrastructure, I never built any package for AUR or community before. Hi folks, back again after six weeks of inactivity (Arch-Linux-wise, that is) ;) I intended to update texlive-bin these next few days, but since it is included in the libpng TODO list, I wonder whether it might be wiser to rebuild with the new libpng and push it to testing, rather that release it now and release a new, identical package for the new libpng a few days later. Or will this take rather weeks? What do you think? Regards to all and best wishes for the new year (also to Roman, whose orthodox new year shall begin next week I believe). FC |
libpng todo list
Am 09.01.2010 11:12, schrieb Jan de Groot:
> On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 10:24 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: >> When do you want to start this? In particular, do we get the >> ffmpeg/x264 rebuilds done a moved from [testing] first? > > I just made the todo list to show how much work is involved in this. > Rebuilding 163 packages requires some serious planning. I can dedicate > the next weekend for Archlinux, I almost have a full weekend including > friday available. My core2quad is idle at this moment, it could use some > build tasks ;) > > As for community: that takes 145 rebuilds. I could help out a bit on > that also, but I have no idea about our community infrastructure, I > never built any package for AUR or community before. You would need access to sigurd and access svn-community from there, the rest is identical infrastructure-wise. |
libpng todo list
Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 10:24 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: When do you want to start this? In particular, do we get the ffmpeg/x264 rebuilds done a moved from [testing] first? I just made the todo list to show how much work is involved in this. Rebuilding 163 packages requires some serious planning. I can dedicate the next weekend for Archlinux, I almost have a full weekend including friday available. My core2quad is idle at this moment, it could use some build tasks ;) As for community: that takes 145 rebuilds. I could help out a bit on that also, but I have no idea about our community infrastructure, I never built any package for AUR or community before. So just to add to the fun :P > sudo checkpkg Password: 18,19c18,19 < usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7 < usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7.0.0 --- > usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8 > usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.0 usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8: SONAME libjpeg.so.8 usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.0: SONAME libjpeg.so.8 This should overlap a lot. Do we want to do both at once? Allan |
libpng todo list
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 21:43 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> > sudo checkpkg > Password: > 18,19c18,19 > < usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7 > < usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7.0.0 > --- > > usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8 > > usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.0 > usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8: SONAME libjpeg.so.8 > usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.0: SONAME libjpeg.so.8 > > This should overlap a lot. Do we want to do both at once? I think that's a good thing to do. Could you build a todo list for libjpeg also? BTW: checkpkg works as non-root also now, pacman -Sp works as non-root. |
libpng todo list
Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 21:43 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > sudo checkpkg Password: 18,19c18,19 < usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7 < usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7.0.0 --- > usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8 > usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.0 usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8: SONAME libjpeg.so.8 usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.0: SONAME libjpeg.so.8 This should overlap a lot. Do we want to do both at once? I think that's a good thing to do. Could you build a todo list for libjpeg also? I haven't rsynced my packages in several weeks and I never do [community] so perhaps Pierre can do this for me... BTW: checkpkg works as non-root also now, pacman -Sp works as non-root. Awesome. It would be even better if it tried getting the package out of the pacman cache first. Someone please implement it for me! :D |
libpng todo list
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Jan de Groot wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 21:43 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: >>> >>> *> sudo checkpkg >>> Password: >>> 18,19c18,19 >>> < usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7 >>> < usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7.0.0 >>> --- >>> *> usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8 >>> *> usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.0 >>> usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8: * SONAME * * * * * * * libjpeg.so.8 >>> usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.0: * SONAME * * * * * * * libjpeg.so.8 >>> >>> This should overlap a lot. *Do we want to do both at once? >> >> I think that's a good thing to do. Could you build a todo list for >> libjpeg also? > > I haven't rsynced my packages in several weeks and I never do [community] so > perhaps Pierre can do this for me... > >> BTW: checkpkg works as non-root also now, pacman -Sp works as non-root. > > Awesome. *It would be even better if it tried getting the package out of the > pacman cache first. *Someone please implement it for me! :D > I tought I implemented it already: http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/commit/?id=61e8cd97fb01997859b135dc0741beff7911c6f5 That commit should be in the last devtools release. |
libpng todo list
Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote: Jan de Groot wrote: On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 21:43 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > sudo checkpkg Password: 18,19c18,19 < usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7 < usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7.0.0 --- > usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8 > usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.0 usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8: SONAME libjpeg.so.8 usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.0: SONAME libjpeg.so.8 This should overlap a lot. Do we want to do both at once? I think that's a good thing to do. Could you build a todo list for libjpeg also? I haven't rsynced my packages in several weeks and I never do [community] so perhaps Pierre can do this for me... BTW: checkpkg works as non-root also now, pacman -Sp works as non-root. Awesome. It would be even better if it tried getting the package out of the pacman cache first. Someone please implement it for me! :D I tought I implemented it already: http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/commit/?id=61e8cd97fb01997859b135dc0741beff7911c6f5 That commit should be in the last devtools release. That is $PKGDEST which is not necessary the pacman cache. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:47 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.