initscripts 2009.03-2
 

Among other things, this fixes an error that the random-seed is not
saved when /var/lib/misc is missing. Here is the full shortlog:


Aaron Griffin (2):
Add adjtime handling to hwclock init
Add the adjtime cron job to install.sh

Allan McRae (1):
Fix status display functions

Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi (3):
Fix minilogd headers
minilogd: Initialize values for accept()
minilogd: ensure we free() the buffer

Thomas Bächler (1):
Create /var/lib/misc if it doesn't exist This is necessary
because the filesystem package doesn't currently contain this directory


Tested and booting on x86_64, please sign off.

initscripts 2009.03-2
 

Thomas Bächler schrieb:

Tested and booting on x86_64, please sign off.



Anyone?

initscripts 2009.03-2
 

Thomas Bächler wrote:

Thomas Bächler schrieb:

Tested and booting on x86_64, please sign off.



Anyone?



Booted fine this morning. Sign-off i686.

Allan

initscripts 2009.03-2
 

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Thomas Bächler schrieb:
>>
>> Tested and booting on x86_64, please sign off.
>>
>
> Anyone?

Haven't tested yet - I'll reboot my i686 machine tonight though. Can't
test on x86_64 as it's a remote machine :)

initscripts 2009.03-2
 

Aaron Griffin schrieb:

Can't
test on x86_64 as it's a remote machine :)


Does that mean you don't trust my awesome package?

initscripts 2009.03-2
 

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Aaron Griffin schrieb:
>>
>> Can't
>> test on x86_64 as it's a remote machine :)
>
> Does that mean you don't trust my awesome package?

No it means I won't be able to see if there were any errors or
output... the machine will just suddenly be back up :)

initscripts 2009.03-2
 

On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 22:04 -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
> >> Aaron Griffin schrieb:
> >>>
> >>> Can't
> >>> test on x86_64 as it's a remote machine :)
> >>
> >> Does that mean you don't trust my awesome package?
> >
> > No it means I won't be able to see if there were any errors or
> > output... the machine will just suddenly be back up :)
>
> Slice has the remote console thingy...I don't know if that is attached
> to vc/1 or if it is just some Xen serial port console thing though.

You can see most boot messages with Slicehost's web console. Problem is
they use a custom xen kernel and that may have odd interaction that our
kernel26 does not.

Dale

initscripts 2009.03-2
 

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
>> Aaron Griffin schrieb:
>>>
>>> Can't
>>> test on x86_64 as it's a remote machine :)
>>
>> Does that mean you don't trust my awesome package?
>
> No it means I won't be able to see if there were any errors or
> output... the machine will just suddenly be back up :)

Slice has the remote console thingy...I don't know if that is attached
to vc/1 or if it is just some Xen serial port console thing though.

-Dan

initscripts 2009.03-2
 

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>
>> Thomas Bächler schrieb:
>>>
>>> Tested and booting on x86_64, please sign off.
>>>
>>
>> Anyone?
>>
>
> Booted fine this morning. *Sign-off i686.
>
> Allan
>
>
>

Same here. Signoff both arches.

initscripts 2009.03-2
 

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
>>> Aaron Griffin schrieb:
>>>>
>>>> Can't
>>>> test on x86_64 as it's a remote machine :)
>>>
>>> Does that mean you don't trust my awesome package?
>>
>> No it means I won't be able to see if there were any errors or
>> output... the machine will just suddenly be back up :)
>
> Slice has the remote console thingy...I don't know if that is attached
> to vc/1 or if it is just some Xen serial port console thing though.

Oh wow it DOES give me vc/1! That's pretty neat :)