Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends
--------------------------------
core/sqlite3 depends on extra/tcl
core/iputils depends on extra/opensp
core/iputils depends on extra/libxslt
core/iputils depends on extra/docbook-xsl
core/madwifi-utils depends on extra/sharutils
core/e2fsprogs depends on extra/bc
core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby
core/madwifi depends on extra/sharutils
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:15 PM, <repomaint@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Invalid Archs
> ---------------
> arch-wiki-docs --> any
> anki --> x86
>
Fixed in cvs. BTW, don't use the 'any' arch. The repos don't have
support for it.
02-20-2009, 08:53 PM
Xavier
Integrity Check x86_64 20-02-2009
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:15 PM, <repomaint@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
>> Invalid Archs
>> ---------------
>> arch-wiki-docs --> any
>> anki --> x86
>>
>
> Fixed in cvs. BTW, don't use the 'any' arch. The repos don't have
> support for it.
>
Which one did you fix? arch-wiki-docs?
I am curious and confused about the anki one. It appears as
unsupported on AUR : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14403
It does not show up in the Integrity check 686 which makes me think it
might be a x86_64 only package. But why? And why is it also in
unsupported?
I tried to check the community webcvs, looking in the devel category
and a few others, I couldn't find any traces of that package. Btw
category makes it very painful to browse that tree, it is much better
with core/extra which don't have that directory structure.
02-20-2009, 09:20 PM
Eric Bélanger
Integrity Check x86_64 20-02-2009
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:15 PM, <repomaint@archlinux.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Invalid Archs
>>> ---------------
>>> arch-wiki-docs --> any
>>> anki --> x86
>>>
>>
>> Fixed in cvs. BTW, don't use the 'any' arch. The repos don't have
>> support for it.
>>
>
> Which one did you fix? arch-wiki-docs?
> I am curious and confused about the anki one. It appears as
> unsupported on AUR : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14403
> It does not show up in the Integrity check 686 which makes me think it
> might be a x86_64 only package. But why? And why is it also in
> unsupported?
> I tried to check the community webcvs, looking in the devel category
> and a few others, I couldn't find any traces of that package. Btw
> category makes it very painful to browse that tree, it is much better
> with core/extra which don't have that directory structure.
>
I fixed both. anki is in science (searching in /var/abs helps in these
cases) . It needs to be built for i686, that's why it appears as
unsupported in AUR (AUR only displays what's in community i686). I
believe Tim doesn't have an i686 machine and doesn't use a i686
chroot.
Integrity Check x86_64 20-02-2009
