frostwire in unstable
 

Hi,
Any reason why frostwire is always in 'unstable' ? Could it be moved to extra, or maybe even community?

Thanks,
Varun

frostwire in unstable
 

Sunday 30 December 2007, Varun Acharya wrote:
| Hi,
| Any reason why frostwire is always in 'unstable' ? Could it be
| moved to extra, or maybe even community?
|
| Thanks,
| Varun

i dont knwo what it is even. if you do and you consider it stable, it
can be moved i think.

- D

--
.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸ .·´
° ° °
° ° °
><((((º> ° °
° °
° <º)))><
<º)))><

frostwire in unstable
 

On Dec 30, 2007 8:49 AM, Damir Perisa <damir.perisa@solnet.ch> wrote:

Sunday 30 December 2007, Varun Acharya wrote:
*| Hi,
*| Any reason why frostwire is always in 'unstable' ? Could it be
*| moved to extra, or maybe even community?
*|

*| Thanks,
*| Varun

i dont knwo what it is even. if you do and you consider it stable, it
can be moved i think.

- D*tomk seems to be maintaining it currently. What do you think tomk?


Varun

frostwire in unstable
 

Varun Acharya wrote:
>
>
> tomk seems to be maintaining it currently. What do you think tomk?
>

I was planning to revisit this whenever I packaged the next upstream
release, so now's as good a time as any. Previous thoughts on this
subject here:

http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=262971#p262971

Last few releases have been consistent, so my plan is to move it back up
to extra.

T.

frostwire in unstable
 

On Dec 31, 2007 4:20 AM, Tom K <tom@archlinux.org> wrote:


I was planning to revisit this whenever I packaged the next upstream
release, so now's as good a time as any. Previous thoughts on this
subject here:


http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=262971#p262971

Last few releases have been consistent, so my plan is to move it back up
to extra.

T.
Hadn't seen that post, thanks for the update.


Varun