dnsutils 9.6.0-P1

01-28-2009, 05:10 AM

Upstream update of BIND. Signoff for dnsutils.

Thanks.

--
K. Piche <kpiche@rogers.com>

01-28-2009, 06:07 PM

Am Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:10:41 -0500
schrieb "K. Piche" <kpiche@rogers.com>:

> Upstream update of BIND. Signoff for dnsutils.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>

Added the x86_64 packages. Can't give a signoff. I don't use them.

-Andy

01-30-2009, 09:13 AM

Andreas Radke wrote:

Am Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:10:41 -0500
schrieb "K. Piche" <kpiche@rogers.com>:

Upstream update of BIND. Signoff for dnsutils.

Thanks.

Added the x86_64 packages. Can't give a signoff. I don't use them.

-Andy

Gajim depends on dnsutils and still works so, with the caveat of that
amount of testing, I will sign-off for i686.

Allan

02-09-2009, 08:47 PM

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Andreas Radke wrote:
>>
>> Am Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:10:41 -0500
>> schrieb "K. Piche" <kpiche@rogers.com>:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Upstream update of BIND. Signoff for dnsutils.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Added the x86_64 packages. Can't give a signoff. I don't use them.
>>
>> -Andy
>>
>
> Gajim depends on dnsutils and still works so, with the caveat of that amount
> of testing, I will sign-off for i686.
>
> Allan
>

looks good. signoff x86_64