FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > ArchLinux > ArchLinux Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 08-29-2008, 01:19 AM
"Aaron Griffin"
 
Default packages in core that don't build from PKGBUILD

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Andrea Scarpino <bash.lnx@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi ML,
> I'm trying to rebuild core repo with pacbuilder and I watched some
> packages doesn't rebuild from PKGBUILD
>
> packages list:
>
> cpio: make fail
> device-mapper: source tarball not found
> gcc: make fail
> gcc-libs: make fail
> iptables: make fail
> libldap: make fail
> libpcap: source tarball not found
> lvm2: source tarball not found
> ntfs-3g: source tarball not found
> popt: connection refused
> wpa_supplicant: require kernel<2.6.26 !!!
>
>
> for some of these the problem is easy to solve, the others I think
> need patch for gcc4.3

Yeah, we have a lot of "source not found" issues in extra too. I was
working on the source tarball generation script a little today, and am
going to configure it to dump to the ML when source is not found.

Just a quick question for ya though - what is pacbuilder? Is it an
automated build tool? If so, I think gcc and gcc-libs have odd
bootstrapping requirements when building. Perhaps Jan or Andy can
enlighten us a little?
 
Old 08-29-2008, 01:27 AM
"Andrea Scarpino"
 
Default packages in core that don't build from PKGBUILD

2008/8/29 Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:
> Yeah, we have a lot of "source not found" issues in extra too. I was
> working on the source tarball generation script a little today, and am
> going to configure it to dump to the ML when source is not found.
great, I didn't know if you know that

> Just a quick question for ya though - what is pacbuilder? Is it an
> automated build tool?
Yes, pacbuilder is a tool to massively recompile archlinux packages from sources
http://code.google.com/p/pacbuilder/

> If so, I think gcc and gcc-libs have odd
> bootstrapping requirements when building. Perhaps Jan or Andy can
> enlighten us a little?
Ok, I'm waiting a reply of Jan/Andy

Thanks

--
Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino
Arch Linux Trusted User
Linux User: #430842
 
Old 08-29-2008, 06:43 AM
"Roman Kyrylych"
 
Default packages in core that don't build from PKGBUILD

2008/8/29 Andrea Scarpino <bash.lnx@gmail.com>:
> 2008/8/29 Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:

>> Just a quick question for ya though - what is pacbuilder? Is it an
>> automated build tool?
> Yes, pacbuilder is a tool to massively recompile archlinux packages from sources
> http://code.google.com/p/pacbuilder/

Wow, project owner is the author of Murrina engine for GTK! :-)

2008/8/29 Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>:
> gcc-libs and gcc failures will probably be due to needing a de_DE locale.
> From their PKGBUILDS:
>
> if ! locale -a | grep ^de_DE; then
> echo "You need the de_DE locale to build gcc."
> return 1
> fi

German conspiracy? :-)
Seriously - why does it _require_ exactly that license? :-)

--
Roman Kyrylych (*оман Кирилич)
 
Old 08-29-2008, 07:54 AM
Thomas Bchler
 
Default packages in core that don't build from PKGBUILD

Andrea Scarpino schrieb:

Hi ML,
I'm trying to rebuild core repo with pacbuilder and I watched some
packages doesn't rebuild from PKGBUILD

packages list:

device-mapper: source tarball not found


Out of date, they delete old sources from the ftp.


iptables: make fail


Will look at that soon, iptables should be out of date as well.


lvm2: source tarball not found
ntfs-3g: source tarball not found


same as for device-mapper


wpa_supplicant: require kernel<2.6.26 !!!


wpa_supplicant requires some kernel headers at build time. You have to
change _kernver to 2.6.26 and adjust makedepends= accordingly.
 
Old 08-29-2008, 09:47 AM
"Roman Kyrylych"
 
Default packages in core that don't build from PKGBUILD

2008/8/29 Jan de Groot <jan@jgc.homeip.net>:
> German conspiracy...
> gcc checks for a bug in the de_DE locale to see if it can enable
> --clocale=gnu. Older versions of glibc have this bug. If de_DE is not
> enabled, this check triggers the wrong result and --clocale=gnu is not
> set.


thanks for explanation

--
Roman Kyrylych (*оман Кирилич)
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:56 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org