Hi,

I would like to move libol from extra to core/lib. The only package that
depends on it (as a makedepends) in the repo is eventlog which is in core.
It would make more sense to have libol in core along with eventlog.

Any objections?

Eric

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


_______________________________________________
arch-dev-public mailing list
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public

Sounds ok to me.

On 12/5/07, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to move libol from extra to core/lib. The only package that
> depends on it (as a makedepends) in the repo is eventlog which is in core.
> It would make more sense to have libol in core along with eventlog.
>
> Any objections?
>
> Eric
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch-dev-public mailing list
> arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
> http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public
>

--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

_______________________________________________
arch-dev-public mailing list
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public

2007/12/5, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to move libol from extra to core/lib. The only package that
> depends on it (as a makedepends) in the repo is eventlog which is in core.
> It would make more sense to have libol in core along with eventlog.
>
> Any objections?
>

not from me.

--
Roman Kyrylych (Ð*оман Кирилич)
_______________________________________________
arch-dev-public mailing list
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public

On Dec 4, 2007 9:55 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> I would like to move libol from extra to core/lib. The only package that
> depends on it (as a makedepends) in the repo is eventlog which is in core.
> It would make more sense to have libol in core along with eventlog.

Yeah we should do this to keep that whole repo-barrier thing in order.
Go for it!

_______________________________________________
arch-dev-public mailing list
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public

2007/12/5, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com>:
> 2007/12/5, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to move libol from extra to core/lib. The only package that
> > depends on it (as a makedepends) in the repo is eventlog which is in core.
> > It would make more sense to have libol in core along with eventlog.
> >
> > Any objections?
> >
>
> not from me.
>

Actually, there is one: see http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8849

--
Roman Kyrylych (Ð*оман Кирилич)
_______________________________________________
arch-dev-public mailing list
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public

On Dec 6, 2007 11:15 AM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/12/5, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com>:
> > 2007/12/5, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to move libol from extra to core/lib. The only package that
> > > depends on it (as a makedepends) in the repo is eventlog which is in core.
> > > It would make more sense to have libol in core along with eventlog.
> > >
> > > Any objections?
> > >
> >
> > not from me.
> >
>
> Actually, there is one: see http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8849

Oooh, I like it if we can get rid of libol. Eric, do you want to look
into this and see if it is feasible?

-Dan

_______________________________________________
arch-dev-public mailing list
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public

On Dec 6, 2007 11:15 AM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/12/5, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com>:
> > 2007/12/5, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to move libol from extra to core/lib. The only package that
> > > depends on it (as a makedepends) in the repo is eventlog which is in core.
> > > It would make more sense to have libol in core along with eventlog.
> > >
> > > Any objections?
> > >
> >
> > not from me.
> >
>
> Actually, there is one: see http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8849

Great catch. If the main authors do not use libol, maybe we shouldn't either?

_______________________________________________
arch-dev-public mailing list
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public

On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Dan McGee wrote:

> On Dec 6, 2007 11:15 AM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2007/12/5, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com>:
>>> 2007/12/5, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to move libol from extra to core/lib. The only package that
>>>> depends on it (as a makedepends) in the repo is eventlog which is in core.
>>>> It would make more sense to have libol in core along with eventlog.
>>>>
>>>> Any objections?
>>>>
>>>
>>> not from me.
>>>
>>
>> Actually, there is one: see http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8849
>
> Oooh, I like it if we can get rid of libol. Eric, do you want to look
> into this and see if it is feasible?
>
> -Dan
>

Sure. I've added myself to the assignee. I'll look into it as I'm also
eventlog's maintainer. I wouldn't mind removing libol from the repo
either if it's no longer needed.

Eric

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


_______________________________________________
arch-dev-public mailing list
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public