On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Andreas Radke <email@example.com> wrote:
Am Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:24:01 -0400
schrieb Dale Blount <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
Why even package 126.96.36.199 for i686 if it's the same as 188.8.131.52?
Seems like a waste of time/bandwidth.
Maybe you are right. But I'm only helping out here on kernel stuff and
I'm not sure if this change doesn't touch i686 architecture at all:
Makefile | 2 +-
include/asm-x86/desc.h | 4 ++--
And we always want to satisfy our users with all the latest release
even if they won't get any gain
2.6.26 is out anyway though, so why bother?
FWIIW, signoff i686
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.