FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > ArchLinux > ArchLinux Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 07-14-2008, 04:45 PM
"Grigorios Bouzakis"
 
Default security update: kernel26-2.6.25.11-1

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de> wrote:
> new kernel is in testing for both arches. no further changes
> expect the version bump. please signoff quickly.
>
> -Andy
>
>
>
>
> We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.25.11
> kernel.
>
> It contains one bugfix, any user of the 2.6.25 kernel on x86-64 with
> untrusted local users is very STRONGLY recommended to upgrade.
>
> I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch between
> 2.6.25.10 and 2.6.25.11
>
> The updated 2.6.25.y git tree can be found at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.25.y.git
> and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web browser:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.25.y.git;a=summary
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
>
> Makefile | 2 +-
> include/asm-x86/desc.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Greg Kroah-Hartman (1):
> Linux 2.6.25.11
>
> Michael Karcher (1):
> x86: fix ldt limit for 64 bit
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>

Signed off x86_64

Greg
 
Old 07-14-2008, 06:18 PM
"Dan McGee"
 
Default security update: kernel26-2.6.25.11-1

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de> wrote:
> Am Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:24:01 -0400
> schrieb Dale Blount <dale@archlinux.org>:
>
>> Why even package 2.6.25.11 for i686 if it's the same as 2.6.25.10?
>> Seems like a waste of time/bandwidth.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>
> Maybe you are right. But I'm only helping out here on kernel stuff and
> I'm not sure if this change doesn't touch i686 architecture at all:
>
> Makefile | 2 +-
> include/asm-x86/desc.h | 4 ++--
>
> And we always want to satisfy our users with all the latest release
> even if they won't get any gain

2.6.26 is out anyway though, so why bother?

-Dan
 
Old 07-14-2008, 06:41 PM
Eric Belanger
 
Default security update: kernel26-2.6.25.11-1

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Dan McGee wrote:


On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de> wrote:

Am Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:24:01 -0400
schrieb Dale Blount <dale@archlinux.org>:


Why even package 2.6.25.11 for i686 if it's the same as 2.6.25.10?
Seems like a waste of time/bandwidth.

Dale



Maybe you are right. But I'm only helping out here on kernel stuff and
I'm not sure if this change doesn't touch i686 architecture at all:

Makefile | 2 +-
include/asm-x86/desc.h | 4 ++--

And we always want to satisfy our users with all the latest release
even if they won't get any gain


2.6.26 is out anyway though, so why bother?

-Dan



FWIIW, signoff i686

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:15 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org