Additionally, it seems silly to change this every time we push out an
ISO. Does anyone have an issue with this patch?
06-30-2008, 05:07 PM
"Travis Willard"
Controversial initscripts change, egads
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> I pushed this because people gripe about these things and it irritates me.
>
> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=84f76aafc5f6d7f3 d2c2141d2930e42dcb82def0
>
> Additionally, it seems silly to change this every time we push out an
> ISO. Does anyone have an issue with this patch?
+1 from me. Getting away from the misinformation that we have "actual
releases" is all good by my count.
06-30-2008, 05:14 PM
Grigorios Bouzakis
Controversial initscripts change, egads
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:37:01AM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> I pushed this because people gripe about these things and it irritates me.
>
> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=84f76aafc5f6d7f3 d2c2141d2930e42dcb82def0
>
> Additionally, it seems silly to change this every time we push out an
> ISO. Does anyone have an issue with this patch?
>
Looks sexier than ever
Greg
06-30-2008, 05:42 PM
Paul Mattal
Controversial initscripts change, egads
Aaron Griffin wrote:
I pushed this because people gripe about these things and it irritates me.
Additionally, it seems silly to change this every time we push out an
ISO. Does anyone have an issue with this patch?
+1 from me.
- P
06-30-2008, 06:01 PM
Simo Leone
Controversial initscripts change, egads
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:37:01AM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> I pushed this because people gripe about these things and it irritates me.
>
> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=84f76aafc5f6d7f3 d2c2141d2930e42dcb82def0
>
> Additionally, it seems silly to change this every time we push out an
> ISO. Does anyone have an issue with this patch?
>
I liked Dan's patch better. But this is +1 too.
-S
06-30-2008, 06:16 PM
Pierre Schmitz
Controversial initscripts change, egads
Am Montag, 30. Juni 2008 18:37:01 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> Additionally, it seems silly to change this every time we push out an
> ISO. Does anyone have an issue with this patch?
+1 from me. But don't forget /etc/issue from filesystem package.
--
http://www.archlinux.de
06-30-2008, 06:22 PM
"Aaron Griffin"
Controversial initscripts change, egads
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
> Am Montag, 30. Juni 2008 18:37:01 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>> Additionally, it seems silly to change this every time we push out an
>> ISO. Does anyone have an issue with this patch?
>
> +1 from me. But don't forget /etc/issue from filesystem package.
Yeah, that was next, assuming no one yelled about this here.
06-30-2008, 10:45 PM
Eric Belanger
Controversial initscripts change, egads
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Am Montag, 30. Juni 2008 18:37:01 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
Additionally, it seems silly to change this every time we push out an
ISO. Does anyone have an issue with this patch?
+1 from me. But don't forget /etc/issue from filesystem package.
Yeah, that was next, assuming no one yelled about this here.
Another +1 from me.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
07-01-2008, 02:00 AM
Allan McRae
Controversial initscripts change, egads
Aaron Griffin wrote:
I pushed this because people gripe about these things and it irritates me.
Additionally, it seems silly to change this every time we push out an
ISO. Does anyone have an issue with this patch?
+1.
I had changed my release name to say "Not a bomb" so when I went through
airports and was asked to boot my laptop, on a subconscious level
security would know everything was fine. Thinking about it, I am
surprised it never backfired...
Allan
07-01-2008, 07:07 AM
"Roman Kyrylych"
Controversial initscripts change, egads
2008/7/1 Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>:
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>
>> I pushed this because people gripe about these things and it irritates me.
>>
>>
>> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=84f76aafc5f6d7f3 d2c2141d2930e42dcb82def0
>>
>> Additionally, it seems silly to change this every time we push out an
>> ISO. Does anyone have an issue with this patch?
>>
>
> +1.
>
+1.
BTW, East-European users used to joke that the major difference between Arch
and other distros is that the appearance of a new release is noticed
only by the change of /etc/issue after one of reboots. :-)
> I had changed my release name to say "Not a bomb" so when I went through
> airports and was asked to boot my laptop, on a subconscious level security
> would know everything was fine. Thinking about it, I am surprised it never
> backfired...