Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends
--------------------------------
core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby
extra/xosd depends on community/xmms
core/iputils depends on extra/jade
core/madwifi-utils depends on extra/sharutils
core/e2fsprogs depends on extra/bc
extra/flac depends on community/xmms
core/madwifi depends on extra/sharutils
Missing Repo Packages
-----------------------
basket-1.0.3-1 in extra/os/i686
scribus-1.3.3.12-1 in extra/os/i686
enscript-1.6.4-3 in extra/os/i686
sonata-1.5.2-1 in extra/os/i686
Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends
--------------------------------
core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby
extra/xosd depends on community/xmms
core/iputils depends on extra/jade
core/madwifi-utils depends on extra/sharutils
core/e2fsprogs depends on extra/bc
extra/flac depends on community/xmms
core/madwifi depends on extra/sharutils
First off, I removed community from this integrity check for now, I
will setup a separate check for community to send to the aur-general
list at a later date.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:17 PM, <repomaint@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Circular Dependencies
> -----------------------
> coreutils>pam>db>coreutils
> eclipse-ecj>gcc-gcj>eclipse-ecj
> archboot>archboot
I am going to move archboot from testing to extra, in order to fix
this error while tpowa is away.
Cheers,
Aaron
07-04-2008, 04:16 AM
Integrity Check i686
Warning: Ensure your ABS tree is clean to prevent false positives.
Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends
--------------------------------
core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby
core/iputils depends on extra/jade
core/madwifi-utils depends on extra/sharutils
core/e2fsprogs depends on extra/bc
core/madwifi depends on extra/sharutils
Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends
--------------------------------
core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby
core/iputils depends on extra/jade
core/madwifi-utils depends on extra/sharutils
core/e2fsprogs depends on extra/bc
core/madwifi depends on extra/sharutils
Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends
--------------------------------
core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby
core/iputils depends on extra/jade
core/madwifi-utils depends on extra/sharutils
core/e2fsprogs depends on extra/bc
core/madwifi depends on extra/sharutils
I have run the repo integrity check script and filtered out the results
for the community repo. Please have a look through the list and check
if any of your packages are involved.
One thing to notice is the missing PKGBUILDs are from packages that were
removed from the repos. It appears that untagging the PKGBUILD removes
the package from community repo but is not enough to remove the package
from abs these days. I will look into fixing that...
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Hi TUs,
>
> I have run the repo integrity check script and filtered out the results for
> the community repo. Please have a look through the list and check if any of
> your packages are involved.
> One thing to notice is the missing PKGBUILDs are from packages that were
> removed from the repos. It appears that untagging the PKGBUILD removes the
> package from community repo but is not enough to remove the package from abs
> these days. I will look into fixing that...
>
> Allan
>
> [...]
> Invalid Archs
> ---------------
> luasql-mysql --> ppc
> coxpcall --> ppc
> copas --> ppc
> premake --> ppc
All of these are mine, I will remove ppc from the arrays...
--
Anders
07-18-2008, 10:27 AM
"Abhishek Dasgupta"
Integrity Check i686
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Missing Makedepends
> ---------------------
> pandoc --> 'haskell-mtl'
> pygoocanvas --> 'pygobject-doc'
> gensplash --> 'klibc-beyond'
>
It seems that 'haskell-mtl' is no longer required
as makedepends for pandoc after ghc 6.8 came out.
I've removed it from the makedepends array.
--
Abhishek
07-18-2008, 11:08 AM
bardo
Integrity Check i686
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
> eclipse-ve --> 'eclipse<3.3'
There's nothing I can do about this. The VE doesn't work with 3.3 and
we're still waiting for a release which was promised in October last
year. Anyway, it's a widely used package, so I'm a bit reluctant in
dropping it.