View Full Version : Fedora Packaging
- f11 build error
- Questions about dependencies in rpm packages
- BuildRequires: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 + mock
- BuildRequires: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 + mock
- Vim compile options in Fedora
- patching datafile locations for upstream projects ?
- patching datafile locations for upstream projects ?
- *.h files in a directory under %{_libdir}?
- Hi all!
- Packaging rubygem-passenger and "mod_rails"
- PATCH: Do not stop and restart iscsid when rescanning disks/partitions (#470223)
- rubygem with extension written in C
- README.Dist is preferrable to README.Fedora
- BR exception could be simplified
- Moonlight support within MonoDevelop
- package without .elc files and emacs guidelines
- Updates to Eclipse Plugin packaging guidelines
- Fontconfig rules installation guidelines change proposal
- libgdiplus-devel subpackage
- Fontconfig rules installation guidelines change proposal
- PackagingDrafts/AutoConf
- anaconda.spec
- app-local feature libraries, plugins
- app-local feature libraries, plugins
- Packaging emacs modes: EL/F compatibility
- how to include rpm-specific files in the spec
- how to update the unifdef without network when compiling kernel src for x86_64 arch
- how to update the unifdef without network when compiling kernel src for x86_64 arch
- The role of %{_libexecdir} for using environment-modules
- The role of %{_libexecdir} for using environment-modules
- The role of %{_libexecdir} for using environment-modules
- The role of %{_libexecdir} for using environment-modules
- The role of %{_libexecdir} for using environment-modules
- looking for a sponsor and review ;)
- time for a review-oh-matic?
- time for a review-oh-matic?
- time for a review-oh-matic?
- package review template
- Broken links to initscript guidelines on Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
- Procedure for renaming a package?
- Request : removal of gtk-sharp
- Please do not redefine %_bindir
- Broken URL in review process page
- Next FPC?
- Question about how libgcj-devel requires zlib
- %doc and %attr problems
- OpenSuse / Fedora Packaging Compatibility?
- OpenSuse / Fedora Packaging Compatibility?
- Use of Internal Libraries
- Are there *any* guidelines for what "Group:" an application should go in?
- id, non-standard-dir-perm
- Packaging mono - RFC
- Long and "advertising" descriptions
- Long and "advertising" descriptions
- Long and "advertising" descriptions (was: Fedora 8 Update: enlightenment-0.16.999.043-3.fc8)
- Long and "advertising" descriptions (was: Fedora 8 Update: enlightenment-0.16.999.043-3.fc8)
- Using newish rpm features in Fedora buildsys
- Group tag in spec files
- Group tag in spec files
- combining code from GPLv2 and Artistic (Perl)
- How to handle unversioned upstream tarballs?
- Calling graphical tools generically e.g. text editor
- Calling graphical tools generically e.g. text editor
- Calling graphical tools generically e.g. text editor
- Calling graphical tools generically e.g. text editor
- Include ia64 tracker bug in review guidelines
- Macro expansion problem
- Macro expansion problem
- Game data packaging
- Revised Haskell Guidelines 2008.08.13
- problem with mock, builds only static library
- resolving rpmlint absolute symlinks issue
- Next meeting?
- Revised Haskell Guidelines 2008.08.13
- Advise on the Samba4/OpenChange stack
- Simple cvs extras suggestion
- Simple cvs extras suggestion
- Best way to add a line to a config file from another package?
- Best way to add a line to a config file from another package?
- Extending PatchUpstreamStatus to include other added content (e.g. desktop files)
- Extending PatchUpstreamStatus to include other added content (e.g. desktop files)
- Extending PatchUpstreamStatus to include other added content (e.g. desktop files)
- Are there *any* guidelines for what "Group:" an application should go in?
- Are there *any* guidelines for what "Group:" an application should go in?
- Are there *any* guidelines for what "Group:" an application should go in?
- OCaml library packaging - no-arch for non-devel?
- OCaml library packaging - no-arch for non-devel?
- fedora-usermgmt - again
- Problems with creating gitosis package
- can Blargg's NTSC libraries be included in fedora ?
- A few links broken in the ReviewGuidelines
- Adding mod_ban to proftpd?
- Adding mod_ban to proftpd?
- Libtool 2.x?
- broken links in Packaging/SourceURL
- Fwd: TeX fonts, part one
- Are debuginfos packaged for F9 updates?
- Remakes legality question
- TeX fonts, part one
- TeX fonts, part one
- rescue.py - handle kickstart in all cases
- Case-insensitive "yum install"?
- Proposed amendment to general packaging guidelines: no bundling of fonts in other packages
- Proposed amendment to general packaging guidelines: no bundling of fonts in other packages
- rakarrack - alternative desktop categories
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting (Tuesday July 22)
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting (Tuesday July 22)
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting (Tuesday July 22)
- R: F10 artwork schedule - time to close proposals?
- Fedora Common Lisp update
- supporting closed source operating systems? (was: Early MinGW packaging guidelines draft)
- Regarding PHP guidelines -- pear packages
- Early MinGW packaging guidelines draft
- desktop file icon/pixmap locations
- desktop file icon/pixmap locations
- New Lisp packaging guidelines draft
- Submission of Haskell Packaging Guidelines for Review
- Submission of Haskell Packaging Guidelines for Review
- Ownership of /etc/maven/fragments and /usr/share/maven2/poms
- Ownership of /etc/maven/fragments and /usr/share/maven2/poms
- Packaging of Nagios
- moc, moc-qt4?
- Customizing Fedora Installer
- Best practices for packaging logfiles
- Package Revision Needed
- Requires(hint):
- Troubles with the .desktop file
- Troubles with the .desktop file
- Requires(hint):
- Why is hard-wired version dependency required by Packaging/Tcl?
- Non-UTF8 gzipped manpages
- Non-UTF8 gzipped manpages
- Unclear in the use of %doc
- Menu entries
- Menu entries
- Mounting Problem...
- Adding mod_proxy_html to httpd package?
- More alternatives fun and games
- How to package EPEL packages
- Creating a mailinglist for discussions about Fedora and openSUSE package guidelines merging
- Creating a mailinglist for discussions about Fedora and openSUSE package guidelines merging
- Creating a mailinglist for discussions about Fedora and openSUSE package guidelines merging
- Creating a mailinglist for discussions about Fedora and openSUSE package guidelines merging
- running testsuites of packages
- Custom splash.jpg
- Python Virtual Provides
- New package help
- Missing FPC meeting
- TeX package naming
- Haskell packages
- New name for dhcp-3.0.5-42.fc7.src.rpm
- Unifying Fedora and openSuse packaging guidelines, rpmmacros and scriplets
- Unifying Fedora and openSuse packaging guidelines, rpmmacros and scriplets
- Unifying Fedora and openSuse packaging guidelines, rpmmacros and scriplets
- clarification about the DraftsTodo table to edit
- No build ID note found - how to resolve this?
- CMake link to upstream documentation added
- file-not-utf8 complaints
- file-not-utf8 complaints
- file-not-utf8 complaints
- eclipse plugin without feature.xml
- How to make SRPMs and RPMs?
- shipping distribution-specific patches *separately*
- shipping distribution-specific patches *separately*
- My absence at yesterdays FPC meeting
- Using alternatives
- jpp naming exception
- jpp naming exception
- Broken dependency /bin/sh?
- New packager question
- Retrograde package version
- SELinux Policy
- Updates to R packaging spec
- python packaging - icons/desktop files and /usr/bin accessibility
- Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Copyrighted specfiles.
- Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- FPC Members: Possible times
- New Fedora Packaging Committee Members
- desktop file validation
- desktop file validation
- Packaging/SysVInitScript reload() bug
- 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
- GCJ Clarification (was More Java guidelines questions)
- forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
- updated ProvidesList proposal
- Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location - deemed not that useful ;-(
- Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location - deemed not that useful ;-(
- Packaging/SysVInitScript wiki page has wrong description for LSB header Required-Stop:
- Packaging/SysVInitScript wiki page has wrong description for LSB header Required-Stop:
- Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
- Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
- My comments about the Java packaging guidelines draft
- Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
- Lua
- Let's discuss... Javascript!
- Meeting Reminder: April 1, 2008
- Java packaging guidelines draft
- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ASCIINaming amended
- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ASCIINaming amended
- /srv (was: one more draft)
- one more draft
- crypto in fedora
- Drafts for next Tuesday
- crypto in fedora
- a proposal to register virtual provides
- java: building from source vs signed .jar's
- OCaml "LGPLv2 with exceptions" - what should be in the License field?
- OCaml "LGPLv2 with exceptions" - what should be in the License field?
- OCaml "LGPLv2 with exceptions" - what should be in the License field?
- Duplication of documentation in subpackages
- Package naming help, please
- alsa-plugins-a52 in Fedora 8?
- GGZ Draft guideline
- Ada packages
- python-svn build failed on koji
- speech-dispatcher packages
- Reviewing an existing package with major changes
- Reviewing an existing package with major changes
- Conditionally building a sub-package?
- Lisp packaging draft
- Possible restructuring of docbook-related packages?
- bootstrapping for scala
- tex/latex doc install location
- Package for python-svn (was pysvn)
- naming of "documentation-devel" package
- Automatic detection of Requires and versions
- Proposal: Eclipse Plugins Guidelines
- Automatic detection of Requires and versions
- Automatic detection of Requires and versions
- Services enabled by default when installed
- release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
- release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
- Package for pysvn
- Tcl packaging guidelines proposal
- release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
- release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
- release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
- release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
- release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
- Contributor License Agreement (CLA)
- Executable "Source:"es
- Python Eggs addition: example%files
- Heads up: tomcat6 package into Fedora 9
- Best way of patching sources for changed libbeagle?
- fortran .mod files
vBulletin® v, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.