View Full Version : Fedora Packaging
- RFD: C/C++ template packages
- RFD: C/C++ template packages
- Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
- Dependence on initscripts/chkconfig
- Dependence on initscripts/chkconfig
- APT,YUM and package status
- Exceptions for packages placing files into /bin, /sbin, /lib or /lib64
- mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- requiring a (non-specific) font?
- change to icon scriptlets to use -f flag seems wrong
- Error with desktop-file-install
- Exceptions for packages placing files into /bin, /sbin, /lib or /lib64
- Using upstream unusual package name
- Using upstream unusual package name
- package naming -- axis2 version 1.4
- guayadeque package review and bundled files
- glibc-devel (or libstdc++-devel) not BuildRequires exceptions?
- glibc-devel (or libstdc++-devel) not BuildRequires exceptions?
- version-release for different branches
- version-release for different branches
- Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
- Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
- php/php53 application packaging
- php/php53 application packaging
- Gnome icon theme not needed in minimal installation
- Gnome icon theme not needed in minimal installation
- When to use a leading underscore?
- Provides for unversioned so files
- Other people modifying specfiles...
- Build dependencies
- Location of LICENSE and README file
- packaging an axis2-based service
- Contributing to a checkinstall package for Fedora releases
- Contributing to a checkinstall package for Fedora releases
- versioning question for stax-utils
- Lorax Help
- Is this a bug or not?
- Change to the Packaging Guidelines
- May binaries be built from generated "source" code?
- May binaries be built from generated "source" code?
- May binaries be built from generated "source" code?
- refuse an upgrade?
- Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
- Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
- .desktop file - desktop-file-install - recent changes ?
- .desktop file - desktop-file-install - recent changes ?
- packaging Digest, Vol 89, Issue 10
- clarification: python2 modules allowed to go into python2-foo?
- clarification: python2 modules allowed to go into python2-foo?
- Script-Tools, which location?
- Obsoletes and Provides
- RPM macros
- revision of Haskell Packaging Guidelines
- Where to install LD_PRELOAD libraries
- Using Cmake in a package...
- Building the freemedforms suite
- Adjust old ruby guidelines to new ruby guidelines
- OT: Where Can I Find Previous Versions?
- Where Can I Find Previous Versions?
- Python compiled files without .py in a name
- Adjust old ruby guidelines to new ruby guidelines
- Questions about feature "Systemd unit cleanup and enhancement"
- Questions about feature "Systemd unit cleanup and enhancement"
- scriptlets
- Adding subpackage == new review?
- root of a repository
- Can multiple packages built from same source?
- GNULib exception link on FPC trac
- package: shrinkwrap-descriptors and arquillian
- opensmtpd - http://www.opensmtpd.org/
- livemedia-creator help
- gnome-shell-extension-updater for fedora
- grive open source client for google drive
- detailed descriptions of the categories?
- Improve the runspoke.py tool and make it callable from make
- what do u think about package this owncloud
- Moving an existing rpmfusion package into Fedora
- uninstall an rpm and related files
- Manpages using %doc
- Manpages using %doc
- Single review request for multiple packages
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - 2012-05-09
- recursively adding files/folders in %files
- recursively adding files/folders in %files
- packaging a library
- use of %verifyscript
- Reusing the same git module for different compat versions?
- Reusing the same git module for different compat versions?
- packaging python applications
- Can rpmbuild resolve these 4 issues ?
- Can rpmbuild resolve these 4 issues ?
- BuildError: mismatch when analyzing $PACKAGE
- Running installation shell script
- should I include tests in the package?
- should I include tests in the package?
- Extending the Static Library Packaging Guidelines to cover inline/template code
- run "make" in the %build section
- signing
- From Harry
- %post script run as root
- games packages / manual installation
- games packages / manual installation
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - 2012-04-18
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - 2012-04-18
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - 2012-04-18
- what a buildroot is
- GSOC : implementation of the survey infrastructure
- RPM Packaging Help
- error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo
- error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo
- error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo
- find: /var/tmp/pcore-0.1-Beta-root: No such file or directory
- find: /var/tmp/pcore-0.1-Beta-root: No such file or directory
- find: /var/tmp/pcore-0.1-Beta-root: No such file or directory
- emacs geben mode, even an old src.rpm
- Cannot cd to %{name}-%{version}
- %prep
- Give errors when tring to build rpm environment
- Give errors when tring to build rpm environment
- Basic Questions
- Basic Questions
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - 2012-04-11
- Filtering requires
- How do Packaging
- Fix repo={http,ftp,nfs} (#810005)
- Fix "memcheck=0" (and other store_true boot args)
- EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
- EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
- Ruby guidelines draft - further discussion
- alternatives --force (removing an old init script)
- alternatives --force (removing an old init script)
- Ruby interpreter independence needs more work
- Ada guidelines changes
- Installing GConf schemas
- RPM doesn't conflict
- Allow installation of optional packages from the base group via ks.
- Icon tag in spec files
- Packaging legacy sysv initscripts and native systemd unit
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting Minutes/Log from 2012-02-29
- New packaging guidelines for Ruby
- New packaging guidelines for Ruby
- support for vg reserved space
- How to download LSB DB Tools ?
- Systemd conversion trigger question
- Guideline change request: make PIE 'must' instead of 'should'
- Packaging guidelines - mandatory rebuilding gems
- Scripting language dependencies
- Packaging guidelines - mandatory rebuilding gems
- Error: Package: alsa-utils-1.0.25-7.fc16.x86_64 (updates) Requires: alsa-lib >= 1.0.25
- Error: Package: alsa-utils-1.0.25-7.fc16.x86_64 (updates) Requires: alsa-lib >= 1.0.25
- Architectures supported by LSB, fedora, ubuntu and kvm
- Error: Package: alsa-utils-1.0.25-7.fc16.x86_64 (updates) Requires: alsa-lib >= 1.0.25
- Additional sources / bundled?
- section: binaries in /bin and /sbin
- section: binaries in /bin and /sbin
- broken recommendation for libexecdir
- Request for confirmation: Which form is required for a review
- Request for confirmation: Which form is required for a review
- Request for confirmation: Which form is required for a review
- Request for confirmation: Which form is required for a review
- Introducing a directory for installed test programs
- Introducing a directory for installed test programs
- Introducing a directory for installed test programs
- I want to edit the How to create an RPM package page
- Time for Lua packaging guidelines?
- Multiple file ownership allowed nowadays?
- PHP 5.4 feature, change proposal to PHP Guidelines
- New owner for clamav?
- Error in PREUN scriptlet in rpm package.
- Shipping only binaries for open source software
- Shipping only binaries for open source software
- Shipping only binaries for open source software
- Shipping only binaries for open source software
- Bug in Octave packaging guideline
- external source files for clementine
- Question regarding split of packages
- Review Request: bacula-docs - Bacula documentation
- Review Request: bacula-docs - Bacula documentation
- Override with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 as workaround allowed?
- Override with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 as workaround allowed?
- Override with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 as workaround allowed?
- Override with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 as workaround allowed?
- Unpackaged optional dependencies
- Creating a spin-off package
- Add storage category, spoke, and builder file.
- Increase flexibility of spec args to Size ctor.
- Protect from tracebacks that occur when running as non-root.
- Use Device.__str__ when logging return value of getDeviceByFoo.
- Beginnings of storage spoke, disk selection
- Packaging guidelines with regards to packages that use Clam Antivirus scanner
- A little help with TuDu, please
- Get paid to package! (Etherpad Lite)
- Don't add packages from @conflicts group as dependencies (#756707)
- fedora-usermgmt
- (re)introducing - fedora-review - tool to help with package reviews
- Fwd: (re)introducing - fedora-review - tool to help with package reviews
- Fwd: (re)introducing - fedora-review - tool to help with package reviews
- Update to Emacs packaging guidelines
- Packaging Guidelines and Servers
- python-2.6 on el5
- Viewing Fedora git source files
- Emacs packaging guideline change of 22nd March 2011 - discussion?
- Emacs packaging guideline change of 22nd March 2011 - discussion?
- .desktop and permissions for using usb?
- linking files in /usr/bin
- ZendFramework a library which should not be bundled?
- ZendFramework a library which should not be bundled?
- Wed Nov 16 Packaging Committee Meeting is cancelled
- Wed Nov 16 Packaging Committee Meeting is cancelled
- Seeking advice on changing a default configuration filename
- Seeking advice on changing a default configuration filename
- python bundled library question
- pushing new UI stuff
- Packaging doubt: RHEL4 -
- Packaging thread safe version of libraries
- Packaging thread safe version of libraries
- Problems using mock on Fedora 15
- Package Groups / "Meta-Packages"
- Vanilla builds guideline?
- Packaging mozilla extensions
- Fwd: Fwd: Broken dependencies: gstreamer-java
- Package naming question
- Potential F16 patches
- Creation of directories via tmpfiles.d directly after package installation
- Creation of directories via tmpfiles.d directly after package installation
- Creation of directories via tmpfiles.d directly after package installation
- Review Guidelines on -devel packages
- Ban autoloading of MPI environment
- Systemd upgrades and user-selected auto-start
- how to refer to files in the tarball
- noarch vs missing deps
- Removing files with RPM's build using python distutils
- Removing files with RPM's build using python distutils
- rpmlint file-size-mismatch and github source URLs
- rpmlint file-size-mismatch and github source URLs
- Are brackets around macros required?
- rpmlint error: htaccessfile
- ensuring a specific version of python
- Mozilla Extension Guidelines
- Mozilla Extension Guidelines
- Changelog guideline
- Changelog guideline
- (C++) Header-Only Package
- (C++) Header-Only Package
- anybody understand mingw's macros?
- Looking for packaging advice/mentor
- EL5 build trouble - .desktop vendor
- rpmlint on Fedora and FHS
- rpmlint on Fedora and FHS
vBulletin® v, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.