Linux Archive

Linux Archive (http://www.linux-archive.org/)
-   64 Studio User (http://www.linux-archive.org/64-studio-user/)
-   -   A request at the hands of the persons responsible for 64 Studio (http://www.linux-archive.org/64-studio-user/356239-request-hands-persons-responsible-64-studio.html)

Diego Simak 04-13-2010 01:20 PM

A request at the hands of the persons responsible for 64 Studio
 
HI Daniel, is this 64 Studio Alpha 3.3 version available for download
at the moment?

Thank you very much,
Diego

2010/4/13 Daniel James <daniel@64studio.com>:
> Hi Ralf,
>
>> I still couldn't solve how to build the proprietary driver or to get the
>> Ubuntu kernel-rt and the packaged restricted modules running on 64
>> Studio 3.0-beta3 amd64.
>>
>> Should I brief the troubles and open a ticket or send an email to the 64
>> Studio developers list?
>
> I don't think this will be necessary, because we now have a 3.3 alpha
> release where the kernel and base distro are different versions compared
> to 3.0-beta3. Let's see where we get to with those versions.
>
> I'm particularly interested to hear if you still experience problems
> with MIDI jitter when using 3.3x versions.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> 64studio-users mailing list
> 64studio-users@lists.64studio.com
> http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
>
_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
64studio-users@lists.64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Daniel James 04-13-2010 01:38 PM

A request at the hands of the persons responsible for 64 Studio
 
Hi Diego,

> is this 64 Studio Alpha 3.3 version available for download
> at the moment?

Yes - there was a very low-key announcement on the development list:

http://lists.64studio.com/pipermail/64studio-devel/2010-March/006789.html

This distro is definitely not for production use; the 32-bit version is
not tested at all, and probably broken. If you don't mind experimenting,
then this release may be of interest - otherwise, I would recommend
waiting for the first beta.

Cheers!

Daniel
_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
64studio-users@lists.64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Diego Simak 04-13-2010 04:13 PM

A request at the hands of the persons responsible for 64 Studio
 
Thank Daniel, good to know about this new release.

I'll wait for the first beta to give a try.

Thank you,
Diego


2010/4/13 Daniel James <daniel@64studio.com>:
> Hi Diego,
>
>> is this 64 Studio Alpha 3.3 version available for download
>> at the moment?
>
> Yes - there was a very low-key announcement on the development list:
>
> http://lists.64studio.com/pipermail/64studio-devel/2010-March/006789.html
>
> This distro is definitely not for production use; the 32-bit version is
> not tested at all, and probably broken. If you don't mind experimenting,
> then this release may be of interest - otherwise, I would recommend
> waiting for the first beta.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> 64studio-users mailing list
> 64studio-users@lists.64studio.com
> http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
>
_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
64studio-users@lists.64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Ralf Mardorf 04-14-2010 02:26 AM

A request at the hands of the persons responsible for 64 Studio
 
Daniel James wrote:
> Hi Diego,
>
>
>> is this 64 Studio Alpha 3.3 version available for download
>> at the moment?
>>
>
> Yes - there was a very low-key announcement on the development list:
>
> http://lists.64studio.com/pipermail/64studio-devel/2010-March/006789.html
>
> This distro is definitely not for production use; the 32-bit version is
> not tested at all, and probably broken. If you don't mind experimenting,
> then this release may be of interest - otherwise, I would recommend
> waiting for the first beta.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Daniel

I'm subscribed to the devel list, but I disabled receiving mails :D,
that's why I wasn't informed too.

I guess AV Linux 2r2 did use LXDE and I liked it very much.
GDM can be a PITA, resp. the troubles I know from GDM for 3.0-beta3 are
because of the X settings, that aren't set up by xorg.conf.
"The ALSA sequencer is broken" and I guess this are good presuppositions
regarding* to MIDI jitter :D.

Is there a deadline for the beta version?

*aaargh, I forgot this vocable and now I remember it and "because of"
does mean something completely different
_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
64studio-users@lists.64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:26 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.