Fw: where is: linux-headers-2.6.29-1-common-multimedia
Am Sonntag, den 31.01.2010, 13:02 +0100 schrieb Mathias Krause:
> Hi list, > > in the meantime, i did some more extensive searches through the web. > That leads me to that thread: > http://www.64studio.com/node/1047?page=1 > > So, i installed > linux-image-2.6.31.6-rt19-20100103 and linux-source-2.6.31.6-rt19-20100103 > > I booted into that kernel, but still NVIDIA installer says: > ERROR: Unable to find the kernel source tree for the currently running > kernel Unfortunately, I haven't got a nvidia card, but I'm trying to remember my experiences some time ago: I _guess_, you can tell the nvidia-installer to take a certain path as the source tree. You can find out, how it's done, by using the --help option. Otherwise: Why not just using the "nv" or "nouveau" driver by editing xorg.conf? Generally, the opensource-drivers are causing less problems - at least the "nv" one. Unfortunately, "nv" doesn't support 3D-hardware acceleration. Ich habe gerade keine nvidia-Karte, aber ich versuche, mich an meine Erfahrungen von früher zu erinnern: Ich _glaube_, Du kannst dem Nvidia-Installer einen bestimmten Pfad mitteilen, den er als Source-Tree benutzen soll. Wie das gemacht wird, findest Du heraus, indem Du die --help Option benutzt. Andererseits wäre es möglich, die Treiber "nv" oder "nouveau" zu benutzen. Die Open-Source-Treiber verursachen normalerweise weniger Ärger - zumindest der "nv". Dummerweise unterstützt "nv" keine 3D-Hardwarebeschleunigung. Greetings! Grüße! Mitsch _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list 64studio-users@lists.64studio.com http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users |
Fw: where is: linux-headers-2.6.29-1-common-multimedia
Hi,
>>> The linux headers where installes in >>> /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.31.6-rt19-20100103 and not in an archive >>> that >>> i have to unpack. I tried to install nvidia, but still the error >>> message >>> is, that it didn't find the kernel sources. >>> >>> So i tried to set the kernel-source path with option. But then i get: >>> >>> Using: nvidia-installer ncurses user interface >>> -> License accepted. >>> -> Installing NVIDIA driver version 190.53. >>> -> Performing CC sanity check with CC="cc". >>> -> Performing CC version check with CC="cc". >>> -> Using the kernel source path >>> '/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.31.6-rt19-20100103/' as specified by the >>> '--kernel-source-path' commandline option. >>> -> Kernel source path: '/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.31.6-rt19-20100103/' >>> -> Kernel output path: '/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.31.6-rt19-20100103/' >>> ERROR: If you are using a Linux 2.4 kernel, please make sure >>> you either have configured kernel sources matching your >>> kernel or the correct set of kernel headers installed >>> on your system. >>> >>> If you are using a Linux 2.6 kernel, please make sure >>> you have configured kernel sources matching your kernel >>> installed on your system. If you specified a separate >>> output directory using either the "KBUILD_OUTPUT" or >>> the "O" KBUILD parameter, make sure to specify this >>> directory with the SYSOUT environment variable or with >>> the equivalent nvidia-installer command line option. >>> >>> Depending on where and how the kernel sources (or the >>> kernel headers) were installed, you may need to specify >>> their location with the SYSSRC environment variable or >>> the equivalent nvidia-installer command line option. >>> >>> Any hints? > > > Perhaps the exported variables path is /usr/src and not > /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.31.6-rt19-20100103/? Did you try "export > SYSOUT=/path..." and "export SYSSRC=/path..." without changing the > terminal or user after doing this? > > What are the outputs of "echo $SYSOUT" and "echo $SYSSRC"? > > Perhaps the headers don't match to the running kernel? Does "uname -r" > fit to the path for the headers? It might be that > /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.31.6-rt19-20100103 is the right path, but > maybe you were running the multimedia kernel. Btw. someone asked if > there's a difference between "multimedia" and "rt", the multimedia > kernel is a rt patched kernel too, but it might be that the version of > the rt patch differs, even for equal vanilla kernel versions. the headers DID match the running kernel, i checked that. > The latest mail says that the original problem now is solved, but that > there still is no explanation because of the error. My read is, that the > variables were not set correctly. > > I would try it manually ... > VARINAME=xyz > export VARINAME=xyz > ... and check if it's set as wanted by ... > echo $VARINAME i will try that. But at the moment, i have a very stable system with older multimedia kernel ... > And because of the sources, I run Synaptic and saw that there aren't the > common headers in the amd64 repository. In any case I guess it is good > to compile the latest kernel and to add latest rtirq, when there's the > need to build the graphics module ... not generally, but at the moment > there seems to be a big step for the real-time kernel (and rtirq). That's an important thing i did not yet understand. What is the difference between the kernel-multimedia-amd64 and rt19-20100103? When looking at the naming of that kernels, the last one seems that rt19 has nothing todo with multimedia ... and the rt kernel seems to be to be more a snapshot, then a tested version.... (and remember, i got that rt19 kernel from a privat repository, not from the official one...) Regards, Mathias _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list 64studio-users@lists.64studio.com http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.